Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H vs Intel Core i7-12650H

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

► remove from comparison AMD R9 PRO 6950H

Der AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H ist ein Mobilprozessor für große Notebooks (z.B. Workstation Laptops) basierend auf die Rembrandt Generation. Der SoC beinhaltet acht Zen 3+ Kerne (Octa-Core CPU) welche mit bis zu 4,9 GHz getaktet werden (Turbo) und SMT / Hyperthreading (16 Threads) unterstützen. Der Chip wird im modernen 6nm Prozess bei TSMC gefertigt und wurde im April 2022 vorgestellt. Im Vergleich zum Consumer Ryzen 9 6900HX, bietet der PRO 6950H keine Übertaktungsfunktionen aber zusätzliche Managemen und Sicherheitsfunktionen (Microsoft Pluton Security Prozessor).

Die neuen Rembrandt APUs bieten einige Neuerungen, wie Support für USB4 mit 40 Gbps, PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s bzw LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2 und AV1 Decode in Hardware.

Die CPU Leistung ist pro Takt vergleichbar mit den alten Ryzen 5000 APUs, dank des neuen 6nm Prozess sind die CPUs aber höher getaktet und dadurch etwas schneller. Die neuen Alder Lake-H Modelle (wie der i9-12900HK sollten durch die höhere Kernanzahl aber noch eine bessere Multi-Threaded-Performance zeigen). Durch den um 100 MHz reduzierten Turbo-Takt, sollte die Performance nur knapp hinter dem Spitzenmodell Ryzen 9 6980HX liegen.

Eine besondere Neuheit ist die aktualisierte Grafikkarte namens Radeon 680M, die nun endlich auf die aktuelle RDNA2-Architektur basiert und im 6950H 12 CUs mit bis zu 2,4 GHz Takt bietet.

Der TDP ist weiterhin mit 45 Watt spezifiziert.

Intel Core i7-12650H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12650H

Der Intel Core i7-12650H ist eine High-End-CPU auf Basis der neuen Alder-Lake-Architektur, die im Januar 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Die CPU basiert auf den Alder Lake-P Chip (für H und P-Serie) und bietet alle 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Golden Cove Architektur) und 4 der 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 16 Threads) und takten von 2,3 bis 4,7 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten von 1,7 - 3,5 GHz und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6700HQ). Im Vergleich zum 12700H bietet der 12650H nur halb so viele E-Kerne und eine schwächere iGPU. Auch vPro wird gar nicht unterstützt.

Performance

Durch die 10 Kerne sollte die Multithread-Leistung oberhalb der alten Tiger-Lake-8-Kerner (bei vergleichbaren Takt, wie der i7-11800H mit bis zu 4,8 GHz) liegen. Bei der Einzelkernperformance dürfte der 12650H auch noch schneller sein, dank der neuen Architektur.

Grafikeinheit

Wie auch der Vorgänger, integriert Intel in Alder Lake eine Intel Xe basierende Grafikeinheit. Beim 12650H sind nur 64 der 96 EUs aktiviert und takten mit bis zu 1,4 GHz.

Features

Wie auch Tiger Lake, hat auch Alder-Lake-P WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) teilintegriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200 und LPDDR4x-4267. Der integrierte Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) ist nun in Version 3.0 verbaut. Die Media Engine Quick Sync 8 ist die selbe wie in Rocket Lake und unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode. Der Chip unterstützt nur PCIe 4.0 (x8 for GPU und zwei x4 für SSDs).

Leistungsaufnahme

Der Intel Core i7-12650H ist mit 45 Watt TDP angegeben (115W PL2). Bei geringer Last, sollte der Stromverbrauch dank der sparsamen Gracemont Kerne sehr gut sein. Gefertigt wird der i7-12650H im modernen Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm).

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HIntel Core i7-12650H
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)Intel Alder Lake-P
CodenameRembrandt H (Zen 3+)Alder Lake-P
Serie: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-P
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX compare3.3 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
» AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 1616 MB
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 1616 MB
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS compare3.3 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 1616 MB
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 1616 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H compare3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 1616 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H compare3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 1616 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS compare3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 1616 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS compare3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 1616 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H compare3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1216 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H compare3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1216 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS compare3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1216 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS compare3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1216 MB
Intel Core i9-12900HK compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 2024 MB
Intel Core i9-12900H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 2024 MB
Intel Core i7-12800H compare1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 2024 MB
» Intel Core i7-12650H1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 1624 MB
Intel Core i5-12600H compare2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 1618 MB
Intel Core i5-12500H compare1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 1618 MB
Intel Core i7-1280P compare1.3 - 4.8 GHz14 / 2024 MB
Intel Core i5-12450H compare1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-1270P compare1.6 - 4.8 GHz12 / 1618 MB
Intel Core i7-1260P compare1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 1618 MB
Intel Core i5-1250P compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 1612 MB
Intel Core i5-1240P compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 1612 MB
Intel Core i3-1220P compare1.1 - 4.4 GHz10 / 1212 MB
Clock3300 - 4900 MHz1700 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB864 KB
L2 Cache4 MB9.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1610 / 16
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology6 nm10 nm
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C
SocketFP7BGA1700
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTThread Director
iGPUAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2400 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+) R9 PRO 6950H

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12650H
54.1 pt (60%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 11624     avg: 12722     median: 12326 (20%)     max: 14009 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1765     avg: 1783     median: 1779 (78%)     max: 1808 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 674     avg: 684     median: 682 (78%)     max: 696 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4469     avg: 4932     median: 4772 (20%)     max: 5404 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1779     avg: 1963     median: 1863 (19%)     max: 2175 Points
01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 248     avg: 255.6     median: 255 (78%)     max: 261 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
25 Points (35%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
31.5 Points (100%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8903 Points (73%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
49328 Points (57%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
267 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8.7 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8100 Points (47%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 44296     avg: 51529     median: 49717 (31%)     max: 58794 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5387     avg: 5573     median: 5485 (66%)     max: 5797 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
127.5 fps (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
282.3 fps (66%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 13.9     avg: 15.4     median: 15.5 (33%)     max: 16.8 fps
0510152025Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.8 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 396     avg: 423     median: 408.5 (7%)     max: 479 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 222     avg: 250.5     median: 250.5 (2%)     max: 279 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4584     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4792 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14813     avg: 16706     median: 16706 (36%)     max: 18599 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
414.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
75129 Points (70%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17964     avg: 21185     median: 22105 (61%)     max: 22811 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
87219 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
87644 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 86345     avg: 87171     median: 87171 (73%)     max: 87997 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 17211     avg: 18465     median: 18888 (48%)     max: 19297 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 19978     avg: 25481     median: 27042 (50%)     max: 27558 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9953     avg: 10680     median: 10655 (53%)     max: 11382 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1719     avg: 1769     median: 1783 (77%)     max: 1797 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8803     avg: 10434     median: 11193 (39%)     max: 11284 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1705     avg: 1734     median: 1732 (77%)     max: 1766 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9546     avg: 10728     median: 11106.5 (35%)     max: 11153 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7551     avg: 7585     median: 7600 (78%)     max: 7605 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 41235     avg: 41366     median: 41387 (46%)     max: 41477 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 524     avg: 543     median: 542 (1%)     max: 564 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
86 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
89888 Points (93%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 251     avg: 262     median: 267 (84%)     max: 268 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 279     avg: 293.7     median: 299 (79%)     max: 303 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1808     avg: 1810     median: 1809.5 (70%)     max: 1811 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 108.1     avg: 110.4     median: 110.4 (19%)     max: 112.7 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 109.9     avg: 122.2     median: 122.2 (25%)     max: 134.5 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 16.1     avg: 16.4     median: 16.4 (19%)     max: 16.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12650H → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.19
log 26. 23:26:26

#0 checking url part for id 14370 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14051 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.009s

#6 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14370 +0s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 14370 +0s ... 0.009s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14051 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#11 got single benchmarks 14051 +0.002s ... 0.012s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.012s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.012s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.012s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.012s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.012s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.012s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.012s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.018s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.018s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.018s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.019s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.017s ... 0.037s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.039s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.045s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#88 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.053s

#89 return log +0.004s ... 0.058s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)