Notebookcheck Logo

Rockchip RK3168 vs CSR8670

Rockchip RK3168

Der Rockchip RK3168 ist ein günstiger ARM-SoC, der in erster Linie für Smartphones konzipiert wurde. Er bietet zwei ARM Cortex-A9 CPU-Kerne mit NEON-Erweiterung, eine PowerVR SGX 540 Grafikkarte (400 MHz) und einen Speichercontroller für (LP-)DDR2/DDR3. Die Performance sollte mit anderen, ähnlich getakteten Cortex-A9-SoCs wie dem Samsung Exynos 4210 vergleichbar sein. Dank fortschrittlicher 28-Nanometer-Fertigung dürfte der RK3168 aber deutlich weniger Energie benötigen und somit längere Akkulaufzeiten ermöglichen.

ModelRockchip RK3168CSR8670
Series
Serie:
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHz2
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2
Apple S5 compare2 / 2
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
» Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1
CSR86700.08 GHz2
ARM Cortex-M4 compare
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare
DK3.5+ST compare2
unknown compare
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHz2
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2
Apple S5 compare2 / 2
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1
» CSR86700.08 GHz2
ARM Cortex-M4 compare
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare
DK3.5+ST compare2
unknown compare
Clock1200 MHz80 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 22
Technology28 nm
FeaturesPowerVR SGX 540 (400 MHz), DDR2/DDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUPowerVR SGX540 (400 MHz)
ArchitectureARM
Announced
Manufacturer RK3168

Benchmarks

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 18. 00:28:11

#0 checking url part for id 4129 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6793 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:13:41 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.047s ... 0.049s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#34 composed specs +0s ... 0.05s

#35 did output specs +0s ... 0.05s

#36 getting avg benchmarks for device 4129 +0s ... 0.05s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#39 got single benchmarks 4129 +0.005s ... 0.056s

#40 getting avg benchmarks for device 6793 +0s ... 0.057s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#42 got single benchmarks 6793 +0.005s ... 0.062s

#43 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#44 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.062s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#46 return log +0.004s ... 0.066s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)