, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP

ATI Radeon IGP 340M

► remove from comparison

Der ATI Radeon IGP 340M ist ein onboard (shared Memory) Grafikchip für Intel Pentium 4M-basierte Notebooks. Dual Display, Powerplay, DDR266 Speicher Support (1 GB max). Die integrierte Grafik stamm vom ATI Mobility Radeon Grafikkern ab, bietet jedoch keinen eigenen Grafikspeicher. Dadurch unterstützt die Grafik auch kein Hardware T&L (Transfer & Lightning).

Dank Hydravision sollte der Chip zwei Displays ansteuern können und mittels PowerPlay kann Strom gespart werden.

Der ATI Radeon IGP 320M ist die Mobile Athlon XP Version des Chipsatzes.

ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP

► remove from comparison

Der ATI Radeon 9100 (PRO) IGP ist ein onboard (shared Memory) Grafikchip mit Codename RS350. Da die Karte nur DirectX 8.1 unterstützt ist sie nicht Aero tauglich. Im Vergleich zur ATI Radeon 9000 (PRO) IGP, besitzt der Chipsatz eine Dual Channel Speicheranbindung und ist daher minimal schneller (auch die Grafik).

ATI Radeon IGP 340MATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP
HerstellerATIATI
Mobility Radeon IGP Serie
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP compare 2/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP compare
Radeon IGP 340M @ 0.18 GHz
Radeon IGP 320M compare @ 0.16 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP compare 2/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP compare
Radeon IGP 340M @ 0.18 GHz
Radeon IGP 320M compare @ 0.16 GHz
Pipelines0 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader2 / 1 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Kerntakt180 MHz400 MHz
Shared Memoryjanein
DirectXDirectX 7DirectX 8.1
Features
  • HyperZ™ memory optimization technology
  • Pixel Tapestry™ architecture
  • Multi-texturing with 3 texture units
  • On-chip texel, pixel, and vertex caches
  • Supports 3D textures and Microsoft® DirectX® texture compression
  • Support for Emboss, Dot-Product 3, and Cubic Environment bump mapping
  • Bilinear, trilinear and anisotropic texture filtering
  • Full Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA)
  • Alpha blending
  • Exponential pixel fog
  • 32-bit or 16-bit Z buffer, 32-bit or 16-bit W buffer, and 8-bit Stencil buffer
  • Extensive 3D mode support
  • Optimized for full performance in true color triple buffered 32BPP acceleration modes
  • Hardware with Pixel Shader 1.4 support
  • Supports up to 2048x1536 @ 32bpp.
  • Anisotropic texture filtering and Full Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA)
Erscheinungsdatum05.10.2002 23.06.2003
Herstellerseitehttp://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityrade...http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityrade...
CodenameRS350
Shadertakt300 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
1235 Points (1%)
min: 1600     avg: 2680     median: 2680 (3%)     max: 3760 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
55.1 Points (0%)
min: 90     avg: 370     median: 370 (0%)     max: 650 Points

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon IGP 340M → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP → 444% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.17
log 27. 00:28:45

#0 checking url part for id 172 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 173 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:22:56 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.046s ... 0.047s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.047s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 172 +0.027s ... 0.074s

#8 got single benchmarks 172 +0.005s ... 0.078s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 173 +0s ... 0.079s

#10 got single benchmarks 173 +0.004s ... 0.082s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.082s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.084s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.084s

#14 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.086s

#15 return log +0.051s ... 0.136s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)