Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380

► remove from comparison

Der Core 2 Duo SL9380 ist ein stromsparender Low Voltage Prozessor für dünne und leichte Notebooks. Er bietet den vollen 6MB Level 2 Cache des Penryn Kerns und bietet dadurch eine bessere Performance als andere 1.8 GHz Core 2 Duo Prozessoren mit weniger Cache (1-3MB üblich). Im Vergleich zum SL9400 bietet der SL9400 einen langsameren FSB mit 800 MHz (statt 1066) und genau 1.8 GHz (Multiplikator 9).

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 ist ein stromsparender Prozessor für kleine und flache Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern und bietet die gesamten 6 MB Level 2 Cache. Dadurch ist die Performance deutlich besser, als bei anderen 2.1 GHz Core 2 Duo Modellen. Mit 17 Watt TDP eignet sich die CPU auch für flache Notebooks. Verbaut wurde der SL9600 z.B. im Apple MacBook Air, wobei hier jedoch durch häufiges Throtteln die Performance niedriger ist (daher stammen auch die schwächeren Benchmarks in unserer Datenbank).

Der C2D SL9600 bietet alle Features des Penryn Kerns wie Virtualisierung VT-x oder Trusted Execution.

Im Unterschied zu anderen Core 2 Duo Modellen, unterstützt der SL9600 nur den Socket BGA956.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SL9380Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1800 MHz2130 MHz
FSB8001066
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt17 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm45 nm1.05-1.15
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956BGA956
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXTEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXT, Intel64
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SL9380Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600
L1 Cache128 KB
$316 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 SL9600 +
2054 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 SL9600 +
3281 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 SL9600 +
4815 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 SL9600 +
2726 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 SL9600 +
min: 1163     avg: 1436     median: 1435.5 (17%)     max: 1708 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 SL9600 +
min: 38     avg: 43.1     median: 43.1 (9%)     max: 48.2 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 SL9600 +
21 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 SL9600 +
51 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 SL9600 +
1306 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 SL9600 +
min: 12450     avg: 15986     median: 15985.5 (8%)     max: 19521 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 SL9600 +
min: 11830     avg: 13238     median: 13237.5 (10%)     max: 14645 MFLOPS
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 SL9600 +
5.1 Points (73%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 04. 14:30:43

#0 checking url part for id 497 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 516 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 497 +0s ... 0.007s

#47 got single benchmarks 497 +0s ... 0.007s

#48 getting avg benchmarks for device 516 +0s ... 0.007s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#50 got single benchmarks 516 +0.007s ... 0.014s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.014s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.015s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.015s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#66 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.018s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#68 return log +0.004s ... 0.022s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)