Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P7370

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380

► remove from comparison

Der Core 2 Duo SL9380 ist ein stromsparender Low Voltage Prozessor für dünne und leichte Notebooks. Er bietet den vollen 6MB Level 2 Cache des Penryn Kerns und bietet dadurch eine bessere Performance als andere 1.8 GHz Core 2 Duo Prozessoren mit weniger Cache (1-3MB üblich). Im Vergleich zum SL9400 bietet der SL9400 einen langsameren FSB mit 800 MHz (statt 1066) und genau 1.8 GHz (Multiplikator 9).

Intel Core 2 Duo T8300

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 war zur Zeit der Erscheinung ein schneller Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den Penryn Kern. Er bietet jedoch nur 3MB Level 2 Cache.

Intel Core 2 Duo P7370

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Dank 25 Watt TDP, eignet sich der Notebook Prozessor auch für 13" Notebooks. Im Vergleich zu stärkeren Penryn Core 2 Duo, bietet der P7450 wahrscheinlich keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und keine Unterstützung für Trusted Execution Technology. 

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SL9380Intel Core 2 Duo T8300Intel Core 2 Duo P7370
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1800 MHz2400 MHz2000 MHz
FSB8008001066
L2 Cache6 MB3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm45 nm, 1-1.25V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956BGA479, PGA478
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXTVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SL9380Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
$241 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T8300 +
min: 2406     avg: 2612     median: 2626 (21%)     max: 2704 Points
83%
1 P7370 +
2191 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T8300 +
min: 3918     avg: 4773     median: 4837 (6%)     max: 4965 Points
83%
1 P7370 +
4022 Points (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T8300 +
min: 1986     avg: 2121     median: 2143 (5%)     max: 2181 Points
80%
1 P7370 +
min: 1705     avg: 1712     median: 1711.5 (4%)     max: 1718 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T8300 +
min: 20     avg: 20.8     median: 21 (5%)     max: 21 s
99%
1 P7370 +
25.2 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T8300 +
min: 50     avg: 50.5     median: 50.5 (2%)     max: 51 s
100%
1 P7370 +
60.3 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T8300 +
1206 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T8300 +
22062 MIPS (10%)
77%
1 P7370 +
17081 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T8300 +
17583 MFLOPS (13%)
83%
1 P7370 +
14679 MFLOPS (11%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T8300 +
min: 4358     avg: 5255     median: 5311 (33%)     max: 6090 Points
58%
1 P7370 +
3060 Points (19%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T8300 +
min: 4     avg: 5.1     median: 5.3 (76%)     max: 5.4 Points
92%
1 P7370 +
4.9 Points (70%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T8300 +
4628 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.19
log 01. 18:59:05

#0 checking url part for id 497 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 379 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 455 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:15:11 +0100 +0s ... 0.001s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 497 +0s ... 0.008s

#11 got single benchmarks 497 +0s ... 0.008s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 379 +0s ... 0.009s

#13 got single benchmarks 379 +0.026s ... 0.034s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 455 +0s ... 0.035s

#15 got single benchmarks 455 +0.007s ... 0.041s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.042s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.047s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.048s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.049s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#49 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.05s

#50 return log +0s ... 0.05s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)