Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6400

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400

► remove from comparison Intel SL9400

Der Core 2 Duo SL9400 ist ein stromsparender Low Voltage Prozessor für dünne und leichte Notebooks. Er bietet den vollen 6MB Level 2 Cache des Penryn Kerns und bietet dadurch eine bessere Performance als andere 1.86 GHz Core 2 Duo Prozessoren mit weniger Cache (1-3MB üblich). Im Vergleich zum SL9380 bietet der SL9400 einen schnelleren FSB mit 1066 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo T6400

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 ist ein Einstiegsprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern, bietet jedoch nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache und ist mit 2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet.

Durch die mittelmäßige Taktfrequenz und den kleinen Level 2 Cache, kann die CPU bei modernen und anspruchsvollen Spielen durchaus limitieren (z.B. große Multiplayerschlachten bei Supreme Commander). Für die mittelmäßig anspruchsvolle (nicht professionelle) Anwendungen wie Office, Entry-Level Videoschnitt, Bildbearbeitung, Internet und casual Gaming sollte die Leistung jedoch ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SL9400Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1860 MHz2000 MHz
FSB1066800
L2 Cache6 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million
Technology45 nm1.050V - 1.150V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956PGA478
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), IDA (Intel Dynamic Acceleration)
Architecturex86x86
$284 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SL9400Intel Core 2 Duo T6400

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SL9400 +
1.1 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2029     avg: 2126     median: 2144 (19%)     max: 2205 Points
min: 2082     avg: 2115     median: 2115 (19%)     max: 2154 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3831     avg: 3848     median: 3850 (5%)     max: 3864 Points
min: 3704     avg: 3963     median: 4005 (5%)     max: 4078 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1329     avg: 1355     median: 1354.5 (16%)     max: 1380 s
1249 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 41.93     avg: 43.1     median: 43.1 (9%)     max: 44.3 s
39.4 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 909     avg: 1300     median: 1300 (3%)     max: 1691 Points
min: 1711     avg: 1764     median: 1767.5 (4%)     max: 1819 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23     avg: 23.8     median: 23 (5%)     max: 25.4 s
min: 26     avg: 28.8     median: 26.5 (6%)     max: 34 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 53     avg: 56.6     median: 58 (2%)     max: 58.9 s
min: 61     avg: 64     median: 64 (3%)     max: 67 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1372     avg: 1428     median: 1433 (6%)     max: 1480 s
min: 1368     avg: 1532     median: 1531.5 (7%)     max: 1695 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 17246     avg: 17255     median: 17255 (8%)     max: 17264 MIPS
min: 18396     avg: 18438     median: 18437.5 (9%)     max: 18479 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 13673     avg: 13693     median: 13692.5 (11%)     max: 13712 MFLOPS
min: 14630     avg: 14670     median: 14670 (11%)     max: 14710 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3921     avg: 4158     median: 4158 (26%)     max: 4395 Points
min: 4479     avg: 5038     median: 4916 (31%)     max: 6001 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
4.8 Points (69%)
4.9 Points (70%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 SL9400 +
5.3 Points (68%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
3809 Points (4%)
3909 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 → 106% n=13

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 06. 14:32:25

#0 checking url part for id 422 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 454 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 422 +0s ... 0.009s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#48 got single benchmarks 422 +0.009s ... 0.018s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 454 +0s ... 0.019s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.019s

#51 got single benchmarks 454 +0.023s ... 0.042s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.042s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.043s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.044s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.05s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#120 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.052s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#122 return log +0.004s ... 0.056s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)