Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9500

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400

► remove from comparison Intel SL9400

Der Core 2 Duo SL9400 ist ein stromsparender Low Voltage Prozessor für dünne und leichte Notebooks. Er bietet den vollen 6MB Level 2 Cache des Penryn Kerns und bietet dadurch eine bessere Performance als andere 1.86 GHz Core 2 Duo Prozessoren mit weniger Cache (1-3MB üblich). Im Vergleich zum SL9380 bietet der SL9400 einen schnelleren FSB mit 1066 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9500

► remove from comparison Intel T9500

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 Dual-Core CPU ist ein oberer Mittelklasse Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zum neueren Core 2 Duo T9550, bietet der T9500 etwas weniger Kerntakt und einen Front-Side-Bus von nur 800MHz.

Dank der 2.6 GHz und des großen Level 2 Cache von 6 MB (shared für alle beiden Kerne), ist die Anwendungsleistung für Single-Threaded Anwendungen und Spiele welche hauptsächlich einen Kern benutzen, sehr gut. Moderne Spiele, welche mehrere Threads benutzen, können jedoch von einem 4-Kerner deutlich mehr profitieren (z.B. ein Drittel mehr Leistung bei DIRT 2 beim Einsatz von 4 Kernen, siehe unseren Prozessorleistung und Spiele Artikel). In 2009 reichte die Performance des T9500 jedoch für eine flüssige Darstellung von allen Spielen (GTA4 ev. knapp) und auch anspruchsvolle Anwendungen kommen mit der Leistung gut aus.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Im Core 2 Duo T9500 wurden keine Features der Penryn Architektur deaktiviert. Daher unterstützt er 64 Bit, Virtualisierung und alle Stromsparfunktionen (z.B. C6 State). Der neuere T9550 unterstützt jedoch bereits Trusted Execution Technology laut Intel.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SL9400Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1860 MHz2600 MHz
FSB1066800
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm1.050V - 1.150V45 nm1.0-1.25V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956BGA479, PGA478, PPGA478
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXTVirtualization Technolgoy (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$284 U.S.$530 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SL9400Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
L1 Cache128 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SL9400 +
1.1 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2029     avg: 2126     median: 2144 (19%)     max: 2205 Points
min: 2659     avg: 2927     median: 2950 (26%)     max: 3208 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3831     avg: 3848     median: 3850 (5%)     max: 3864 Points
min: 5094     avg: 5441     median: 5419 (7%)     max: 5885 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 1329     avg: 1355     median: 1354.5 (16%)     max: 1380 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 41.93     avg: 43.1     median: 43.1 (9%)     max: 44.3 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 909     avg: 1300     median: 1300 (3%)     max: 1691 Points
min: 2273     avg: 2374     median: 2352 (5%)     max: 2598 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23     avg: 23.8     median: 23 (5%)     max: 25.4 s
min: 17     avg: 17.5     median: 17.5 (4%)     max: 18 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 53     avg: 56.6     median: 58 (2%)     max: 58.9 s
min: 42     avg: 43.5     median: 43.5 (2%)     max: 45 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1372     avg: 1428     median: 1433 (6%)     max: 1480 s
min: 1126     avg: 1196     median: 1195.5 (5%)     max: 1265 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 17246     avg: 17255     median: 17255 (8%)     max: 17264 MIPS
23933 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 13673     avg: 13693     median: 13692.5 (11%)     max: 13712 MFLOPS
19062 MFLOPS (15%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3921     avg: 4158     median: 4158 (26%)     max: 4395 Points
min: 5765     avg: 6306     median: 6334 (40%)     max: 6668 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
4.8 Points (69%)
5.5 Points (79%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 SL9400 +
5.3 Points (68%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 SL9400 +
3809 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 → 131% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 29. 08:28:24

#0 checking url part for id 422 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 376 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 422 +0s ... 0.01s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#48 got single benchmarks 422 +0.009s ... 0.02s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 376 +0s ... 0.021s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#51 got single benchmarks 376 +0.012s ... 0.033s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.034s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.035s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.04s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.042s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.043s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.043s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.045s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.046s

#115 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.046s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.026s ... 0.072s

#117 return log +0.004s ... 0.075s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)