, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9550

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 ist ein stromsparender Prozessor für kleine und flache Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern und bietet die gesamten 6 MB Level 2 Cache. Dadurch ist die Performance deutlich besser, als bei anderen 2.1 GHz Core 2 Duo Modellen. Mit 17 Watt TDP eignet sich die CPU auch für flache Notebooks. Verbaut wurde der SL9600 z.B. im Apple MacBook Air, wobei hier jedoch durch häufiges Throtteln die Performance niedriger ist (daher stammen auch die schwächeren Benchmarks in unserer Datenbank).

Der C2D SL9600 bietet alle Features des Penryn Kerns wie Virtualisierung VT-x oder Trusted Execution.

Im Unterschied zu anderen Core 2 Duo Modellen, unterstützt der SL9600 nur den Socket BGA956.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9550

► remove from comparison Intel T9550

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 Dual-Core CPU ist ein oberer Mittelklasse Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der T9550 ist vergleichbar mit dem teureren P9600, welcher jedoch auf einen TDP von 25 Watt spezifiziert ist (T9550 max. 35 Watt TDP).

Dank der 2.66 GHz und des großen Level 2 Cache von 6 MB (shared für alle beiden Kerne), ist die Anwendungsleistung für Single-Threaded Anwendungen und Spiele welche hauptsächlich einen Kern benutzen, sehr gut. Moderne Spiele, welche mehrere Threads benutzen, können jedoch von einem 4-Kerner deutlich mehr profitieren (z.B. ein Drittel mehr Leistung bei DIRT 2 beim Einsatz von 4 Kernen, siehe unseren Prozessorleistung und Spiele Artikel). In 2009 reichte die Performance des T9550 jedoch für eine flüssige Darstellung von allen Spielen (GTA4 ev. knapp) und auch anspruchsvolle Anwendungen kommen mit der Leistung gut aus.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Im Core 2 Duo T9550 wurden keine Features der Penryn Architektur deaktiviert. Daher unterstützt er 64 Bit, Virtualisierung und alle Stromsparfunktionen (z.B. C6 State).

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9550 passt in den Socket P (BGA479, PGA478).

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SL9600Intel Core 2 Duo T9550
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2130 MHz2660 MHz
FSB10661066
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm1.05-1.1545 nm1.05-1.212V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956BGA479, PGA478
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXT, Intel64Virtualization, Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep (up to C6), ExBit, SSE4.1
Architecturex86x86
$316 U.S.$316 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SL9600Intel Core 2 Duo T9550

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2054 Points (18%)
min: 2911     avg: 2958     median: 2966 (26%)     max: 3001 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3281 Points (4%)
min: 5418     avg: 5530     median: 5577 (8%)     max: 5615 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 SL9600 +
4815 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 SL9600 +
2726 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1163     avg: 1436     median: 1435.6 (17%)     max: 1708.09 s
922 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 38     avg: 43.1     median: 43.1 (9%)     max: 48.2 s
29 s (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T9550 +
min: 2347     avg: 2384     median: 2385 (5%)     max: 2417 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
21 s (5%)
min: 16     avg: 17     median: 17 (4%)     max: 17.91 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51 s (2%)
min: 40     avg: 41.6     median: 42 (2%)     max: 42.84 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1306 s (6%)
min: 1059     avg: 1105     median: 1123 (5%)     max: 1131.98 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 12450     avg: 15986     median: 15985.5 (8%)     max: 19521 MIPS
min: 6820     avg: 17433     median: 20774 (10%)     max: 24706 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 11830     avg: 13238     median: 13237.5 (10%)     max: 14645 MFLOPS
min: 5870     avg: 14981     median: 19516 (15%)     max: 19556 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T9550 +
min: 6414     avg: 6553     median: 6619 (42%)     max: 6625 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.1 Points (73%)
min: 3.9     avg: 5.1     median: 5.5 (79%)     max: 5.5 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T9550 +
min: 5252     avg: 5399     median: 5424 (6%)     max: 5496 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 → 121% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 20. 17:32:55

#0 checking url part for id 516 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 449 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:10:47 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 516 +0s ... 0.009s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#48 got single benchmarks 516 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 449 +0s ... 0.016s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#51 got single benchmarks 449 +0.015s ... 0.032s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.033s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.034s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.035s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.04s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.041s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#109 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.042s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#111 return log +0.004s ... 0.046s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)