Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6600

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 ist ein stromsparender Prozessor für kleine und flache Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern und bietet die gesamten 6 MB Level 2 Cache. Dadurch ist die Performance deutlich besser, als bei anderen 2.1 GHz Core 2 Duo Modellen. Mit 17 Watt TDP eignet sich die CPU auch für flache Notebooks. Verbaut wurde der SL9600 z.B. im Apple MacBook Air, wobei hier jedoch durch häufiges Throtteln die Performance niedriger ist (daher stammen auch die schwächeren Benchmarks in unserer Datenbank).

Der C2D SL9600 bietet alle Features des Penryn Kerns wie Virtualisierung VT-x oder Trusted Execution.

Im Unterschied zu anderen Core 2 Duo Modellen, unterstützt der SL9600 nur den Socket BGA956.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9900

► remove from comparison Intel T9900

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 Dual-Core CPU löst praktisch den Core 2 Extreme X9100 (ebenfalls 3.06 GHz und 6MB L2 Cache) ab und hat zusätzlich noch einen deutlich geringeren Stromverbrauch (35 versus 44 Watt TDP dank verbessertem Stepping und Enhanced Halt State (C1E)). Einzig der freie Multiplikator unterscheidet den X9100 noch vom T9900 und bietet einen Vorteil (die einfache Übertaktbarkeit per Erhöhung des Multiplikators). Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Dank der hohen Taktung von 3 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen deutlich geschlagen. Nur Anwendungen welche mehr als 2 parallele Threads effizient nutzen können (z.B. 3D Rendering) sind auf Quad-Core Prozessoren schneller. In der Einzelthreadperformance können erst die aktuellen Core i7 Modelle den T9900 deutlich abhängen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9900 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo T6600

► remove from comparison

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 Dual-Core CPU ist ein Mittelklasse Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zu stärkeren T-Prozessoren bietet der T6600 keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen (Virtualization Technology VT-x) und nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache (Topmodelle bis zu 6 MB). Der Stromverbrauch ist jedoch auch mit max. 35 Watt spezifiziert (TDP).

Durch die mittelmäßige Taktfrequenz und den kleinen Level 2 Cache, kann die CPU bei modernen und anspruchsvollen Spielen durchaus limitieren (z.B. große Multiplayerschlachten bei Supreme Commander). Für die mittelmäßig anspruchsvolle (nicht professionelle) Anwendungen wie Office, Entry-Level Videoschnitt, Bildbearbeitung, Internet und casual Gaming sollte die Leistung jedoch ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T6600 passt in den Socket P (PGA478)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SL9600Intel Core 2 Duo T9900Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2130 MHz3060 MHz2200 MHz
FSB10661066800
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million410 Million
45 nm1.05-1.1545 nm1.05-1.2125 V45 nm1.00-1.25V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)PGA478
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXT, Intel64SSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution TechnologyIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit, SSE4.1
Architecturex86x86x86
$316 U.S.$530 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SL9600Intel Core 2 Duo T9900Intel Core 2 Duo T6600

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2054 Points (18%)
min: 3353     avg: 3538     median: 3537.5 (32%)     max: 3722 Points
min: 2308     avg: 2391     median: 2355 (21%)     max: 2631 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3281 Points (4%)
min: 6318     avg: 6886     median: 7094 (10%)     max: 7247 Points
min: 4335     avg: 4525     median: 4472 (6%)     max: 4833 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 SL9600 +
4815 Points (4%)
101%
1 T6600 +
min: 4229     avg: 4727     median: 4864.5 (4%)     max: 4948 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 SL9600 +
2726 Points (17%)
90%
1 T6600 +
min: 2257     avg: 2454     median: 2463 (15%)     max: 2633 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1163     avg: 1436     median: 1435.5 (17%)     max: 1708 s
799 s (9%)
min: 1190     avg: 2015     median: 2269 (27%)     max: 2331 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 38     avg: 43.1     median: 43.1 (9%)     max: 48.2 s
25.1 s (5%)
min: 37     avg: 63.1     median: 71.1 (14%)     max: 73.3 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T9900 +
2787 Points (6%)
70%
1 T6600 +
min: 1852     avg: 1942     median: 1947 (4%)     max: 1989 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
21 s (5%)
15.3 s (3%)
min: 22     avg: 23     median: 23 (5%)     max: 24 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51 s (2%)
37.1 s (2%)
min: 54     avg: 59     median: 60.5 (3%)     max: 61 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1306 s (6%)
972 s (4%)
min: 1322     avg: 1334     median: 1334.5 (6%)     max: 1343 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 12450     avg: 15986     median: 15985.5 (8%)     max: 19521 MIPS
25083 MIPS (12%)
min: 20109     avg: 20199     median: 20216 (10%)     max: 20254 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 11830     avg: 13238     median: 13237.5 (10%)     max: 14645 MFLOPS
20460 MFLOPS (16%)
min: 14760     avg: 15060     median: 15119.5 (12%)     max: 15241 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T9900 +
8922 Points (56%)
53%
1 T6600 +
min: 3511     avg: 4691     median: 4746.5 (30%)     max: 5758 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 SL9600 +
5.1 Points (73%)
112%
1 T9900 +
5.7 Points (81%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T6600 +
min: 5.6     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (73%)     max: 5.7 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T9900 +
6045 Points (6%)
70%
1 T6600 +
min: 4198     avg: 4217     median: 4216.5 (4%)     max: 4235 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 → 135% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 → 108% n=9

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 22. 12:25:11

#0 checking url part for id 516 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 475 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 485 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 18 May 2022 13:12:25 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#81 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#82 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#83 getting avg benchmarks for device 516 +0s ... 0.01s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#85 got single benchmarks 516 +0.006s ... 0.017s

#86 getting avg benchmarks for device 475 +0s ... 0.017s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#88 got single benchmarks 475 +0.007s ... 0.025s

#89 getting avg benchmarks for device 485 +0s ... 0.025s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.026s

#91 got single benchmarks 485 +0.025s ... 0.051s

#92 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.052s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.054s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#139 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#140 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#142 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#143 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.058s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.059s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.06s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#169 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#171 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#172 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#173 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#174 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#175 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#176 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#177 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#178 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#179 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#180 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#181 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#182 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#183 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#184 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#185 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#186 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#187 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#188 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#189 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#190 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#191 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#192 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.066s

#193 return log +0s ... 0.067s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)