Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6770

Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300

► remove from comparison

Der Core 2 Duo SP9300 ist ein sparsamer Mittelklasse Doppelkernprozessor. Im Vergleich zu anderen Core 2 Duo Prozessoren mit 2.26 GHz, bietet der SP9300 den vollen 6MB Level 2 Cache des Penryn Kerns. Weiters sind alle Features des Kerns aktiviert (VT-x, Trusted Execution).

Dank der 6 MB Level 2 Cache, ist die Performance besser als bei gleichgetakteten Core 2 Duo Modellen (z.B. P8400).

 

Intel Core 2 Duo T6770

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 ist ein Notebookprozessor basierend auf den Penryn Kern. Er bietet jedoch nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache und ist daher langsamer als andere Core 2 Duo mit 2.3 GHz.

 

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SP9300Intel Core 2 Duo T6770
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2260 MHz2300 MHz
FSB1066800
L2 Cache6 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million
Technology45 nm1.05-1.15V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA956
FeaturesVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution Technology, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$284 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SP9300

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 SP9300 +
min: 2508     avg: 2522     median: 2517 (22%)     max: 2541 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 SP9300 +
min: 4753     avg: 4759     median: 4757 (6%)     max: 4767 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 SP9300 +
min: 1146     avg: 1642     median: 1641.5 (19%)     max: 2137 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 SP9300 +
min: 35.95     avg: 52.7     median: 52.7 (11%)     max: 69.4 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 SP9300 +
min: 1941     avg: 1996     median: 1974 (4%)     max: 2074 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 SP9300 +
min: 20.03     avg: 21     median: 21 (5%)     max: 22 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 SP9300 +
min: 47.24     avg: 47.6     median: 47.6 (2%)     max: 48 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 SP9300 +
1254 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 SP9300 +
19380 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 SP9300 +
16680 MFLOPS (13%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 SP9300 +
min: 4425     avg: 4480     median: 4480 (28%)     max: 4535 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 SP9300 +
5.7 Points (73%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 29. 08:37:47

#0 checking url part for id 421 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 468 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 421 +0s ... 0.007s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#48 got single benchmarks 421 +0.009s ... 0.017s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 468 +0s ... 0.017s

#50 got single benchmarks 468 +0s ... 0.017s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.017s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.017s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.018s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.018s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.018s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#74 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.021s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#76 return log +0.003s ... 0.025s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)