, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8800

Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600

► remove from comparison Intel SP9600

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 ist ein sparsamer High-End Dual Core Prozessor für flache Notebooks. Er basiert auf dem Core 2 Duo P9500, wird jedoch nur in BGA (Ball Grid Array) Ausführung angeboten zum direkten Auflöten auf das Mainboard. Dadurch ist die Package Größe des Prozessors auch deutlich geringer (22m2 versus 35mm2 beim P9500). Der SP9600 kann dadurch in sehr flachen aber trotzdem leistungsstarken Notebooks eingesetzt werden (z.B. Lenovo Thinkpad T400s). Der Stromverbrauch von max. 25 W TDP ist jedoch identisch

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo SP9600 ist vergleichbar mit dem ebenfalls mit 2.53 GHz getakteten Core 2 Duo T9400 und dadurch sollte sie für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

 

Intel Core 2 Duo P8800

► remove from comparison Intel P8800

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Im Vergleich zu den stärkeren Modellen bietet, der P8800 zwar nur die Hälfte an Level 2 Cache, jedoch bleibt dadurch der Stromverbrauch mit maximal 25 Watt auch geringer. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Dank der relativ hohen Taktung von 2.66 GHz, ist die Performance jedoch für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert von einem schnelleren Prozessor).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SP9600Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2530 MHz2660 MHz
FSB10661066
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm1.05-1.15V45 nm1.00V-1.25V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956BGA479, PGA478
FeaturesVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution Technology, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology
Architecturex86x86
$316 U.S.$241 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SP9600Intel Core 2 Duo P8800

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 P8800 +
1.5 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2836 Points (25%)
min: 2798     avg: 2890     median: 2932 (26%)     max: 2940 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
5309 Points (7%)
min: 5240     avg: 5357     median: 5370 (7%)     max: 5460 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1863 s (22%)
min: 982     avg: 993     median: 993.4 (12%)     max: 1004.7 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 30.3     avg: 44.4     median: 44.4 (9%)     max: 58.485 s
min: 30.8     avg: 31.4     median: 31.4 (6%)     max: 31.9 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2189 Points (5%)
min: 2309     avg: 2355     median: 2355 (5%)     max: 2401 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18 s (4%)
min: 19     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (4%)     max: 19.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
43 s (2%)
min: 44     avg: 45.6     median: 45.6 (2%)     max: 47.2 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1117 s (5%)
min: 961     avg: 1048     median: 1048.4 (5%)     max: 1135.7 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
23240 MIPS (11%)
min: 24450     avg: 26155     median: 26155 (12%)     max: 27860 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
18549 MFLOPS (14%)
18000 MFLOPS (14%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 SP9600 +
7587 Points (48%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 SP9600 +
5.4 Points (77%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 P8800 +
6.3 Points (81%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 P8800 +
4658 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 → 104% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 28. 09:14:03

#0 checking url part for id 500 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 477 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:10:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 500 +0s ... 0.007s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#48 got single benchmarks 500 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 477 +0s ... 0.012s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#51 got single benchmarks 477 +0.007s ... 0.02s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.021s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#89 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.028s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#91 return log +0.004s ... 0.032s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)