Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300

► remove

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 ist ein CULV Notebookprozessor für kleine und flache Notebooks. Durch die geringe Taktrate von nur 1.3 GHz ist die CPU auf lediglich 10 Watt TDP spezifiziert. Die Performance ist dadurch realtiv gering, für anspruchslose Aufgaben ausreichend und nicht so einschränkend, wie bei Atom basierenden Netbooks.

In vielen Notebooks (z.B. Asus UL Serie) kann die CPU werksmäßig deutlich übertaktet werden (auf z.B. 1.7 GHz) wodurch auch die Leistung deutlich steigt.

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

► remove

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 ist ein Einstiegsprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern, bietet jedoch nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache und ist mit 2.1 GHz relativ langsam getaktet. Im Vergleich zum vergleichbaren T6500, bietet der T6570 jedoch Virtualisierungsfunktionen VT-x.

Durch die mittelmäßige Taktfrequenz und den kleinen Level 2 Cache, kann die CPU bei modernen und anspruchsvollen Spielen durchaus limitieren (z.B. große Multiplayerschlachten bei Supreme Commander). Für die mittelmäßig anspruchsvolle (nicht professionelle) Anwendungen wie Office, Entry-Level Videoschnitt, Bildbearbeitung, Internet und casual Gaming sollte die Leistung jedoch ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300Intel Core 2 Duo T6570
Intel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
PenrynPenryn
: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
1300 MHz2100 MHz
800800
3 MB2 MB
2 / 22 / 2
10 35
410 410
45 45
107 mm2107 mm2
105 °C
BGA956PGA478
Enhanced Speedstep, VT-x, TXTIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 SU7300 +
84 Points (13%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 SU7300 +
160 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 72     avg: 72.2     median: 72.2 (2%)     max: 72.43 Points
01020304050607080Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 38.39     avg: 38.7     median: 38.7 (14%)     max: 39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.77     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (2%)     max: 0.79 Points
1.2 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.4 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 869     avg: 1462     median: 1496 (15%)     max: 1645
min: 1589     avg: 2167     median: 2274 (23%)     max: 2314
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 1642     avg: 2777     median: 2813 (5%)     max: 3181
min: 2963     avg: 4042     median: 4276 (7%)     max: 4284
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 3020     avg: 3045     median: 3045.5 (3%)     max: 3067 Points
4768 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 1501     avg: 1576     median: 1586 (12%)     max: 1629 Points
2462 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 2029     avg: 3417     median: 3615 (43%)     max: 4607.85 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 37.2     avg: 67.6     median: 61.3 (12%)     max: 118.483 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
885 (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 SU7300 +
2537 MIPS (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 SU7300 +
1445 MIPS (10%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
4.8 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
26.5 fps (8%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 SU7300 +
0.5 fps (1%)
010Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 SU7300 +
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 SU7300 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 SU7300 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 SU7300 +
8394 Seconds (59%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 SU7300 +
2.9 sec (62%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1078     avg: 1167     median: 1178 (7%)     max: 1229 Points
min: 1326     avg: 1751     median: 1820 (10%)     max: 1886 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 22     avg: 34.2     median: 37.2 (8%)     max: 38 s
min: 24     avg: 27.5     median: 25.1 (5%)     max: 36 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 54     avg: 78     median: 85 (4%)     max: 88 s
min: 57.892     avg: 66.5     median: 61 (3%)     max: 86 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1341     avg: 1830     median: 2059 (9%)     max: 2091 s
min: 1342     avg: 1534     median: 1344 (6%)     max: 1916 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 10480     avg: 11679     median: 11968.5 (6%)     max: 12300 MIPS
min: 15404     avg: 17907     median: 19000 (9%)     max: 19317 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 8790     avg: 9118     median: 8911 (7%)     max: 9860 MFLOPS
min: 10662     avg: 13404     median: 14160 (11%)     max: 15390 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 2440     avg: 2819     median: 2819 (18%)     max: 3198 Points
min: 3419     avg: 4583     median: 4691 (29%)     max: 5134 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
4.2 Points (60%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
4.1 Points (53%)
5 Points (64%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 2303     avg: 2494     median: 2579 (3%)     max: 2600 Points
min: 3764     avg: 3902     median: 3902 (5%)     max: 4040 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 SU7300 +
11926 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 SU7300 +
983 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
1536 (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
855 (17%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1024 (14%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1707 (3%)
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SU7300 +
207 (12%)
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SU7300 +
392 (2%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 → 139% n=17

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.16
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)