Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9800

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 ist ein stromsparender Prozessor für Subnotebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn-3M Kern und bietet daher 3MB Level 2 Cache und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Er bietet alle Features des Penryn Kerns, wie Virtualisierung und Trusted Execution. Die Performance ist durch die geringe Taktrate begrenzt.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9800

► remove from comparison Intel T9800

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 ist ein schneller high-end Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Zur Zeit der Einführung war er der schnellste Core 2 Duo für Notebooks, später wurde er jedoch vom T9900 abgelöst (mit 3.06 GHz).

Dank der hohen Taktung von 2.93 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen deutlich geschlagen. Nur Anwendungen welche mehr als 2 parallele Threads effizient nutzen können (z.B. 3D Rendering) sind auf Quad-Core Prozessoren schneller. In der Einzelthreadperformance können erst die aktuellen Core i7 Modelle und die schnelleren Dual Core CPUs mit 3 GHz (T9900), den T9800 abhängen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9800 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SU9400Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1400 MHz2920 MHz
FSB8001066
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm, 1.05-1.15V45 nm, 1-1.25 V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, VT, TXTVirtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$262 U.S.$530 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SU9400Intel Core 2 Duo T9800

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SU9400 +
0.8 Points (2%)
3633 Points (32%)
6839 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 SU9400 +
3266 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 SU9400 +
1707 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 SU9400 +
min: 1784     avg: 2131     median: 1878 (22%)     max: 3227 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 SU9400 +
min: 55     avg: 66.6     median: 59.3 (12%)     max: 100 s
2626 Points (6%)
15 s (3%)
38 s (2%)
1008 s (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 11610     avg: 12619     median: 12820 (6%)     max: 12931 MIPS
26991 MIPS (13%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 8763     avg: 9718     median: 10109 (8%)     max: 10270 MFLOPS
20305 MFLOPS (16%)
6618 Points (42%)
5.7 Points (81%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 SU9400 +
min: 4.3     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (58%)     max: 4.7 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
2757 Points (3%)
5802 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 → 177% n=11

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 05. 04:32:54

#0 checking url part for id 424 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 448 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 424 +0s ... 0.01s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.011s

#48 got single benchmarks 424 +0.021s ... 0.032s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 448 +0s ... 0.032s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#51 got single benchmarks 448 +0.008s ... 0.041s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.042s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.043s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.049s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.049s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.053s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#139 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.054s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#141 return log +0.004s ... 0.058s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)