Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 vs Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5450

Intel Core 2 Duo T5270

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für günstige Laptops. Er basiert auf den Merom-Kern, bietet jedoch keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen. Trotz der geringen Taktrate, ist er auf relativ hohe 35Watt TDP spezifiziert und eignet sich daher nicht für kleine Notebooks.

Intel Core 2 Duo U7700

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 ist ein Stromspar-Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks aus 2006. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern und punktet mit 64-Bit Unterstütztung und einem TDP von lediglich 10 Watt. Mit einer maximalen Taktrate von 1.33 GHz ist er die schnellste Variante der Core 2 Duo U7000 Serie (U7500 1.1 GHz, U7600 1.2 GHz).

Intel Core 2 Duo T5450

► remove from comparison

OEM Prozessor

1.0375 - 1.3 V

MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64 (Intel's x86-64 implementation), XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), LaGrande Technology (Intel Trusted Execution Technology) Virtualization Technology

Die size: 111 mm²

Steppings: L2, M0

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5270Intel Core 2 Duo U7700Intel Core 2 Duo T5450
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMerom-2048Merom-2048Merom-2048
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom-2048
Intel Core 2 Duo T54701.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T54701.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 « 1.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T54701.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5450 « 1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1400 MHz1330 MHz1660 MHz
FSB800533667
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt10 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm, 1.075V-1.250V65 nm, 0.8 - 0.975V65 nm
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPPGA478
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1427 Points (9%)
1335 Points (8%)
min: 1015     avg: 1504     median: 1666 (10%)     max: 1669 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2717 Points (2%)
2515 Points (2%)
min: 1919     avg: 2827     median: 3121.5 (2%)     max: 3144 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T5270 +
65.8 s (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 U7700 +
1047 Points (2%)
131%
1 T5450 +
min: 1344     avg: 1381     median: 1367 (3%)     max: 1433 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T5270 +
38.5 s (8%)
101%
1 T5450 +
min: 33.62     avg: 33.8     median: 33.9 (7%)     max: 34 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5270 +
16817 MIPS (8%)
91%
1 T5450 +
15268 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5270 +
6253 MFLOPS (5%)
166%
1 T5450 +
10407 MFLOPS (8%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 U7700 +
2460 Points (5%)
142%
1 T5450 +
min: 3322     avg: 3505     median: 3501 (7%)     max: 3813 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5450 +
4 Points (57%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 → 93% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5450 → 116% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 16:58:36

#0 checking url part for id 441 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 385 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 336 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.022s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 441 +0.003s ... 0.024s

#8 got single benchmarks 441 +0.006s ... 0.03s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 385 +0.003s ... 0.033s

#10 got single benchmarks 385 +0.009s ... 0.042s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 336 +0.003s ... 0.045s

#12 got single benchmarks 336 +0.034s ... 0.079s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.079s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.057s ... 0.136s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.136s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)