Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5500

Intel Core 2 Duo T5550

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 ist ein Einstiegs-Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom-2M Kern und wird daher noch in 65nm gefertigt. Die Virtualisierungsfunktionen des Merom Kerns sind jedoch beim T5550 deaktiviert. Durch die geringe Taktrate, den relativ kleinen Cache und den langsamen FSB ist die Performance des T5550 limitiert und war auch in 2008 nur in der Einsteigerklasse anzusiedeln. Im Vergleich zu Pentium und Celeron Modellen, sollte der Core 2 Duo jedoch mehr Stromsparmechanismen bieten.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5500

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 ist ein Einstiegs-Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom-2M Kern und wird daher noch in 65nm gefertigt. Die Virtualisierungsfunktionen des Merom Kerns sind jedoch beim T5500 deaktiviert. Durch die geringe Taktrate, den relativ kleinen Cache und den langsamen FSB ist die Performance des T5500 limitiert und war auch in 2008 nur in der Einsteigerklasse anzusiedeln. Im Vergleich zu Pentium und Celeron Modellen, sollte der Core 2 Duo jedoch mehr Stromsparmechanismen bieten.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5550Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1830 MHz1660 MHz
FSB667667
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm, 1.075V-1.250V65 nm, 1.0375-1.3V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T5550Intel Core 2 Duo T5500

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1826 Points (15%)
min: 1656     avg: 1717     median: 1660 (14%)     max: 1836 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3397 Points (4%)
min: 3026     avg: 3190     median: 3069 (4%)     max: 3476 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1484 Points (3%)
min: 1339     avg: 1387     median: 1392 (3%)     max: 1426 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T5500 +
204 Points (78%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T5500 +
min: 31.34     avg: 32.7     median: 32.7 (7%)     max: 34 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T5500 +
83 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T5500 +
1923 s (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5500 +
min: 15145     avg: 16727     median: 15195 (7%)     max: 19840 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5500 +
min: 7386     avg: 9338     median: 10261 (8%)     max: 10367 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T5500 +
532 Points (36%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T5500 +
min: 4776     avg: 5083     median: 4898 (66%)     max: 5787 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
3891 Points (24%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5550 +
4.8 Points (69%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 → 90% n=4

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.19
log 28. 20:05:32

#0 checking url part for id 390 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 174 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.004s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 390 +0s ... 0.005s

#23 got single benchmarks 390 +0.013s ... 0.017s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 174 +0.001s ... 0.018s

#25 got single benchmarks 174 +0.029s ... 0.047s

#26 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.047s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.048s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.049s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.05s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.05s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.053s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.054s

#45 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.055s

#46 return log +0.004s ... 0.059s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)