Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 ist ein Einstiegs Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den alten Merom Kern mit lediglich 2 MB Level 2 Cache. Er bietet keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und ist mit 2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet.

Intel Core 2 Duo L7700

► remove from comparison

Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 ist ein auf den Merom Kern basierender Doppelkern Prozessor für Notebooks. Er wurde später von dem in 45nm gefertigten und gleichgetakteten Core 2 Duo T6600 abgelöst. Durch Verbesserungen im Kern ist dieser auch etwas schneller.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5800Intel Core 2 Duo L7700Intel Core 2 Duo T5900
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz1800 MHz2200 MHz
FSB800800800
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt17 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million
Technology65 nm65 nm65 nm
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.85 °C
SocketPPGA478Socket P
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T5800
L1 Cache128 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 1988     avg: 2000     median: 2000 (18%)     max: 2013 Points
106%
1 T5900 +
min: 2116     avg: 2123     median: 2123 (19%)     max: 2130 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 3714     avg: 3755     median: 3716 (5%)     max: 3835 Points
108%
1 T5900 +
min: 3894     avg: 3997     median: 3997 (5%)     max: 4100 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 1629     avg: 1640     median: 1639.5 (3%)     max: 1650 Points
114%
1 T5900 +
min: 1838     avg: 1864     median: 1864 (4%)     max: 1890 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 28.06     avg: 28.5     median: 28.5 (6%)     max: 28.9 s
101%
1 T5900 +
26 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 69.6     avg: 90.3     median: 90.3 (4%)     max: 111 s
101%
1 T5900 +
65 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 1511     avg: 1521     median: 1520.5 (7%)     max: 1530 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 11028     avg: 14012     median: 14011.5 (7%)     max: 16995 MIPS
133%
1 T5900 +
18700 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 7694     avg: 10270     median: 10270 (8%)     max: 12846 MFLOPS
136%
1 T5900 +
14000 MFLOPS (11%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 4286     avg: 4884     median: 5025 (32%)     max: 5340 Points
92%
1 T5900 +
4639 Points (29%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5800 +
4.9 Points (70%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T5800 +
3533 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.18
log 27. 23:31:37

#0 checking url part for id 438 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 384 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 439 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:14:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.006s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#62 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#63 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#64 getting avg benchmarks for device 438 +0s ... 0.007s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.007s

#66 got single benchmarks 438 +0.019s ... 0.026s

#67 getting avg benchmarks for device 384 +0s ... 0.026s

#68 got single benchmarks 384 +0s ... 0.027s

#69 getting avg benchmarks for device 439 +0s ... 0.027s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#71 got single benchmarks 439 +0.006s ... 0.033s

#72 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.035s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.036s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.038s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.041s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.042s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#104 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.042s

#105 return log +0s ... 0.042s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)