Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5600

Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 ist ein Einstiegs Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den alten Merom Kern mit lediglich 2 MB Level 2 Cache. Er bietet keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und ist mit 2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5600

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 ist ein Einstiegs-Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern und wird daher noch in 65nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zum T5670, bietet der T5600 einen langsameren FSB mit 667 MHz  (deshalb auch der minimal höhere Takt) und keine Idle States Unterstützung. Dafür fehlen dem T5670 die Virtualisierungsfunktionen VT-x.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5800Intel Core 2 Duo T5600
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz1830 MHz
FSB800667
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm65 nm1.0375V-1.300V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.85 °C100 °C
SocketPPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXTVirtualization VT-x, Enhanced Speedstep, Intel 64, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T5800Intel Core 2 Duo T5600
$241 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 1988     avg: 2000     median: 2000 (18%)     max: 2013 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 3714     avg: 3755     median: 3716 (5%)     max: 3835 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T5600 +
48.8 s (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1629     avg: 1640     median: 1639.5 (3%)     max: 1650 Points
min: 1540     avg: 1560     median: 1559.5 (3%)     max: 1579 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T5600 +
215 Points (83%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 28.06     avg: 28.5     median: 28.5 (6%)     max: 28.9 s
31 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 69.6     avg: 90.3     median: 90.3 (4%)     max: 111 s
79 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1511     avg: 1521     median: 1520.5 (7%)     max: 1530 s
1818 s (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 11028     avg: 14012     median: 14011.5 (7%)     max: 16995 MIPS
min: 16812     avg: 18676     median: 16959 (8%)     max: 22256 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 7694     avg: 10270     median: 10270 (8%)     max: 12846 MFLOPS
min: 8209     avg: 10449     median: 11471 (9%)     max: 11667 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T5600 +
561 Points (38%)
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T5600 +
1792 Points (74%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T5600 +
1740 Points (79%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T5600 +
min: 5153     avg: 5868     median: 5902 (79%)     max: 6347 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4286     avg: 4884     median: 5025 (32%)     max: 5340 Points
min: 3579     avg: 4104     median: 4157 (26%)     max: 4522 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5800 +
4.9 Points (70%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T5800 +
3533 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 → 101% n=7

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 08. 18:10:45

#0 checking url part for id 438 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 171 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#40 getting avg benchmarks for device 438 +0s ... 0.006s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#42 got single benchmarks 438 +0.019s ... 0.025s

#43 getting avg benchmarks for device 171 +0s ... 0.025s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#45 got single benchmarks 171 +0.018s ... 0.043s

#46 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.044s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.046s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.052s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.053s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#88 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.053s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.021s ... 0.074s

#90 return log +0.004s ... 0.078s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)