Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5550

Intel Core 2 Duo T5870

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 ist ein Einstiegs Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den alten Merom Kern mit lediglich 2 MB Level 2 Cache. Er bietet keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und ist mit 2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5550

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 ist ein Einstiegs-Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom-2M Kern und wird daher noch in 65nm gefertigt. Die Virtualisierungsfunktionen des Merom Kerns sind jedoch beim T5550 deaktiviert. Durch die geringe Taktrate, den relativ kleinen Cache und den langsamen FSB ist die Performance des T5550 limitiert und war auch in 2008 nur in der Einsteigerklasse anzusiedeln. Im Vergleich zu Pentium und Celeron Modellen, sollte der Core 2 Duo jedoch mehr Stromsparmechanismen bieten.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5870Intel Core 2 Duo T5550
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz1830 MHz
FSB800667
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm1.075V-1.175V65 nm1.075V-1.250V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T5870Intel Core 2 Duo T5550
SocketPPGA478

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1875     avg: 2092     median: 2088.5 (19%)     max: 2316 Points
1826 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3480     avg: 3855     median: 3809.5 (5%)     max: 4319 Points
3397 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T5870 +
min: 1355     avg: 1916     median: 1915.5 (23%)     max: 2476 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T5870 +
min: 42.47     avg: 60     median: 60 (12%)     max: 77.6 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1560     avg: 1606     median: 1628 (3%)     max: 1630 Points
1484 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T5870 +
min: 26.78     avg: 27.4     median: 27 (6%)     max: 28.27 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T5870 +
min: 61.8     avg: 63.9     median: 63.9 (3%)     max: 66 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T5870 +
1492 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5870 +
16620 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5870 +
12000 MFLOPS (9%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3903     avg: 3926     median: 3925.5 (25%)     max: 3948 Points
3891 Points (24%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5550 +
4.8 Points (69%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T5870 +
4.9 Points (63%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 → 92% n=4

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 02. 10:44:06

#0 checking url part for id 442 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 390 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.004s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#40 getting avg benchmarks for device 442 +0s ... 0.005s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#42 got single benchmarks 442 +0.008s ... 0.013s

#43 getting avg benchmarks for device 390 +0s ... 0.014s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#45 got single benchmarks 390 +0.01s ... 0.024s

#46 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.025s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.03s

#76 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.031s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#78 return log +0.004s ... 0.035s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)