Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC T610 vs UNISOC Tangula T700

UNISOC T610

► remove from comparison T610

Der Unisoc T610 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1,8 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0 (24, 8, 8 MPixel Support). Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 933 MHz und LPDDR4/4X mit 1600 MHz. Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP2 Grafikkarte bietet zwei Kerne und 614 MHz Taktung und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

UNISOC Tangula T700

► remove from comparison Tangula T700

Der Unisoc Tangula T700 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1.8 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. er bietet ähnliche Spezifikationen wie der Unisoc Tiger T618 bzw T610.

Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0. Zudem ist die Nutzung von 90-Hz-Bildschirmen möglich. Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP2 Grafikkarte bietet zwei Kerne und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

show full text
ModelUNISOC T610UNISOC Tangula T700
Series
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A75 / A55
Serie: Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7001.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 « 1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz1800 - 1800 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm12 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP2 (614 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - T610
0.5 pt (36%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -65%
...
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3349 -28%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354 -28%
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 -20%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 -11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 -5%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 -5%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4601 -1%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 0%
UNISOC T610
0.4653
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4682 1%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 1%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4702 1%
Samsung Exynos 9611
0.4743 2%
UNISOC T618
0.475 2%
Mediatek Helio G80
0.4793 3%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
0.4795 3%
UNISOC Tangula T700
0.4809 3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
0.4813 3%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 179%
0%
100%
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Tangula T700
0.5 pt (37%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -66%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 -3%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 -3%
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4682 -3%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 -3%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4702 -2%
Samsung Exynos 9611
0.4743 -1%
UNISOC T618
0.475 -1%
Mediatek Helio G80
0.4793 0%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
0.4795 0%
UNISOC Tangula T700
0.4809
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
0.4813 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
0.4915 2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
0.516 7%
Mediatek Helio P70
0.517 8%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
0.53 10%
Mediatek Helio P90
0.546 14%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
0.552 15%
Mediatek Helio G90T
0.571 19%
MediaTek Dimensity 720
0.575 20%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 170%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
T610 +
min: 2784     avg: 2944     median: 2848 (34%)     max: 3200 Points
min: 2815     avg: 2888     median: 2888 (34%)     max: 2961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
T610 +
min: 2791     avg: 2986     median: 2986 (34%)     max: 3181 Points
min: 2844     avg: 2903     median: 2902.5 (33%)     max: 2961 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
T610 +
min: 345     avg: 357.3     median: 348.5 (15%)     max: 387 Points
min: 347     avg: 351.5     median: 351.5 (15%)     max: 356 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
T610 +
min: 1034     avg: 1264     median: 1298.5 (2%)     max: 1425 Points
min: 1291     avg: 1342     median: 1342 (2%)     max: 1393 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
T610 +
3075 ms (4%)
3722 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
T610 +
11952 Points (11%)
10382 Points (9%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T610 +
53 Points (15%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
65 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
T610 +
39058 Points (33%)
44936 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
T610 +
39644 Points (32%)
37643 Points (30%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
T610 +
27469 Points (5%)
36709 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
T610 +
65175 Points (24%)
67597 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
T610 +
min: 171346     avg: 173534     median: 173534 (17%)     max: 175722 Points
186885 Points (18%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
T610 +
min: 162968     avg: 181377     median: 181377 (11%)     max: 199786 Points
164867 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
T610 +
min: 62063     avg: 63978     median: 63977.5 (18%)     max: 65892 Points
65438 Points (18%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
T610 +
1942 Points (0%)
2078 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
T610 +
min: 7645     avg: 8075     median: 8074.5 (37%)     max: 8504 Points
min: 8743     avg: 8745     median: 8744.5 (40%)     max: 8746 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
T610 +
5364 Points (28%)
5412 Points (29%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
T610 +
16046 Points (34%)
12328 Points (26%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
T610 +
7337 Points (48%)
8438 Points (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
10033 Points (18%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 T610 +
356 Points (14%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T610 +
8.5 Watt (4%)
min: 0     avg: 4     median: 4 (2%)     max: 8.02 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T610 +
2 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T610 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tangula T700 → 103% n=18

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 16. 06:47:54

#0 checking url part for id 14014 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13247 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.084s ... 0.085s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.085s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14014 +0.016s ... 0.101s

#7 got single benchmarks 14014 +0.017s ... 0.118s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13247 +0.014s ... 0.132s

#9 got single benchmarks 13247 +0.012s ... 0.144s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.144s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.112s ... 0.256s

#12 return log +0.031s ... 0.287s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)