, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6670

Intel Core 2 Duo T6400

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 ist ein Einstiegsprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern, bietet jedoch nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache und ist mit 2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet.

Durch die mittelmäßige Taktfrequenz und den kleinen Level 2 Cache, kann die CPU bei modernen und anspruchsvollen Spielen durchaus limitieren (z.B. große Multiplayerschlachten bei Supreme Commander). Für die mittelmäßig anspruchsvolle (nicht professionelle) Anwendungen wie Office, Entry-Level Videoschnitt, Bildbearbeitung, Internet und casual Gaming sollte die Leistung jedoch ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo T6670

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 ist ein Einstiegsprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern, bietet jedoch nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache und ist mit 2.2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet. Im Unterschied zum C2D T6600, bietet der T6670 Virtualisierungsfunktionen VT-x und eine höhere maximale Temperatur von 105°C. Dadurch eignet er sich eher für Business Notebooks.

Durch die mittelmäßige Taktfrequenz und den kleinen Level 2 Cache, kann die CPU bei modernen und anspruchsvollen Spielen durchaus limitieren (z.B. große Multiplayerschlachten bei Supreme Commander). Für die mittelmäßig anspruchsvolle (nicht professionelle) Anwendungen wie Office, Entry-Level Videoschnitt, Bildbearbeitung, Internet und casual Gaming sollte die Leistung jedoch ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T6670 passt in den Socket P (PGA478)

 

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T6400Intel Core 2 Duo T6670
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz2200 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Technology45 nm45 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478PGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), IDA (Intel Dynamic Acceleration)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T6400Intel Core 2 Duo T6670
Transistors410 Million
Die Size107 mm2

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2082     avg: 2115     median: 2115 (19%)     max: 2154 Points
min: 2352     avg: 2365     median: 2365 (21%)     max: 2378 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3704     avg: 3963     median: 4005 (5%)     max: 4078 Points
min: 4428     avg: 4434     median: 4430 (6%)     max: 4444 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1249 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
39.4 s (8%)
min: 34.975     avg: 52.1     median: 52.1 (10%)     max: 69.14 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1711     avg: 1764     median: 1767.5 (4%)     max: 1819 Points
1850 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 26     avg: 28.8     median: 26.5 (6%)     max: 34 s
min: 23.868     avg: 33.4     median: 33.4 (7%)     max: 43 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 61     avg: 64     median: 64 (3%)     max: 67 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1368     avg: 1532     median: 1531.5 (7%)     max: 1695 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 18396     avg: 18438     median: 18437.5 (9%)     max: 18479 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 14630     avg: 14670     median: 14670 (11%)     max: 14710 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4479     avg: 5038     median: 4916 (31%)     max: 6001 Points
min: 4384     avg: 4567     median: 4559 (29%)     max: 4757 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T6400 +
4.9 Points (70%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T6670 +
5.6 Points (72%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T6400 +
3909 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 → 93% n=11

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 23. 03:35:45

#0 checking url part for id 454 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 467 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:10:47 +0100 +0s ... 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 454 +0s ... 0.008s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.009s

#48 got single benchmarks 454 +0.025s ... 0.034s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 467 +0s ... 0.034s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.035s

#51 got single benchmarks 467 +0.009s ... 0.044s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.045s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.052s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.054s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.055s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.057s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#110 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.058s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#112 return log +0.004s ... 0.062s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)