Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P7370

Intel Core 2 Duo T6500

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 ist ein Einstiegsprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern, bietet jedoch nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache und ist mit 2.1 GHz relativ langsam getaktet. Im Vergleich zum vergleichbaren T6570, bietet der T6500 jedoch keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen VT-x.

Durch die mittelmäßige Taktfrequenz und den kleinen Level 2 Cache, kann die CPU bei modernen und anspruchsvollen Spielen durchaus limitieren (z.B. große Multiplayerschlachten bei Supreme Commander). Für die mittelmäßig anspruchsvolle (nicht professionelle) Anwendungen wie Office, Entry-Level Videoschnitt, Bildbearbeitung, Internet und casual Gaming sollte die Leistung jedoch ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo P7370

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Dank 25 Watt TDP, eignet sich der Notebook Prozessor auch für 13" Notebooks. Im Vergleich zu stärkeren Penryn Core 2 Duo, bietet der P7450 wahrscheinlich keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und keine Unterstützung für Trusted Execution Technology. 

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T6500Intel Core 2 Duo P7370
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2100 MHz2000 MHz
FSB8001066
L2 Cache2 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million
Technology45 nm45 nm
Die Size107 mm2
SocketPGA478
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T6500

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2197     avg: 2283     median: 2249 (20%)     max: 2487 Points
2191 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3800     avg: 4254     median: 4262 (6%)     max: 4757 Points
4022 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 1158     avg: 1172     median: 1171.5 (14%)     max: 1185 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 36.5     avg: 36.9     median: 37.1 (7%)     max: 37.24 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1768     avg: 1856     median: 1879 (4%)     max: 1887 Points
min: 1705     avg: 1712     median: 1711.5 (4%)     max: 1718 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 22     avg: 24.2     median: 24.5 (5%)     max: 25.58 s
25.2 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 54     avg: 58.3     median: 58.5 (3%)     max: 62.3 s
60.3 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 1339     avg: 1348     median: 1341 (6%)     max: 1363 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
19458 MIPS (9%)
17081 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
15381 MFLOPS (12%)
14679 MFLOPS (11%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4087     avg: 4922     median: 5278 (33%)     max: 5522 Points
3060 Points (19%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
min: 5     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (73%)     max: 5.1 Points
4.9 Points (70%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 3945     avg: 4015     median: 4014.5 (4%)     max: 4084 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 → 91% n=9

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 13. 07:28:18

#0 checking url part for id 453 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 455 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 453 +0s ... 0.008s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.008s

#48 got single benchmarks 453 +0.027s ... 0.035s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 455 +0s ... 0.036s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#51 got single benchmarks 455 +0.005s ... 0.041s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.049s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.049s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#102 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.05s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#104 return log +0.004s ... 0.054s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)