, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9300

Intel Core 2 Duo T6670

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 ist ein Einstiegsprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern, bietet jedoch nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache und ist mit 2.2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet. Im Unterschied zum C2D T6600, bietet der T6670 Virtualisierungsfunktionen VT-x und eine höhere maximale Temperatur von 105°C. Dadurch eignet er sich eher für Business Notebooks.

Durch die mittelmäßige Taktfrequenz und den kleinen Level 2 Cache, kann die CPU bei modernen und anspruchsvollen Spielen durchaus limitieren (z.B. große Multiplayerschlachten bei Supreme Commander). Für die mittelmäßig anspruchsvolle (nicht professionelle) Anwendungen wie Office, Entry-Level Videoschnitt, Bildbearbeitung, Internet und casual Gaming sollte die Leistung jedoch ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T6670 passt in den Socket P (PGA478)

 

Intel Core 2 Duo T9300

► remove from comparison Intel T9300

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks der Mittelklasse. Er gehört zur Penryn Serie und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der T9400 ist zwar ähnlich getaktet bietet jedoch einen höher getakteten FSB.

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo T9300 sollte für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T6670Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2200 MHz2500 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache2 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm45 nm1-1.25V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478BGA479, PGA478
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T6670Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
L1 Cache128 KB
FeaturesVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
$316 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2352     avg: 2365     median: 2365 (21%)     max: 2378 Points
min: 2719     avg: 2823     median: 2799 (25%)     max: 3009 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4428     avg: 4434     median: 4430 (6%)     max: 4444 Points
min: 4968     avg: 5230     median: 5189.5 (7%)     max: 5854 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T6670 +
2196 s (26%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 34.975     avg: 52.1     median: 52.1 (10%)     max: 69.14 s
31.6 s (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1850 Points (4%)
min: 2109     avg: 2249     median: 2257.5 (5%)     max: 2336 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23.868     avg: 33.4     median: 33.4 (7%)     max: 43 s
min: 17     avg: 17.6     median: 17.9 (4%)     max: 18 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
101 s (4%)
min: 43     avg: 43.4     median: 43.1 (2%)     max: 44 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2241 s (10%)
1173 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
11254 MIPS (5%)
23021 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
8839 MFLOPS (7%)
18370 MFLOPS (14%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4384     avg: 4567     median: 4559 (29%)     max: 4757 Points
min: 4423     avg: 5707     median: 5899 (37%)     max: 6890 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T9300 +
min: 4.8     avg: 5.3     median: 5.4 (77%)     max: 5.4 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T6670 +
5.6 Points (72%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T9300 +
min: 4554     avg: 4735     median: 4735 (5%)     max: 4916 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 → 132% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 25. 03:36:08

#0 checking url part for id 467 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 377 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:10:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 467 +0s ... 0.009s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#48 got single benchmarks 467 +0.009s ... 0.019s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 377 +0s ... 0.019s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.019s

#51 got single benchmarks 377 +0.025s ... 0.044s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.046s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.047s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.053s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#121 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#134 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#135 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#136 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.055s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#138 return log +0.004s ... 0.059s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)