Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7800

Intel Core 2 Duo T7200

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 war zur Zeit des Erscheinens ein Mittelklasse Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den älteren Merom Kern (später von dem schnelleren Penryn Kern abgelöst) und bietet die vollen 4 MB Level 2 Cache und Virtualization VT-x Funktionen. Der später erschienenen T7250 bietet nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache dafür jedoch einen schnelleren FSB. Trotzdem sollte er im Schnitt langsamer sein.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7800

► remove from comparison Intel T7800

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 ist baugleich zum Core 2 Extreme X7800 jedoch mit geringerem TDP und ohne offenem Multiplikator. Der T7800 basiert noch auf den Merom Kern mit 4 MB Level 2 Cache welcher später vom schnelleren Penryn Kern abgelöst wurde (mit max 6 MB Level 2 Cache).

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7200Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz2600 MHz
FSB667800
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm1.0375V-1.300V65 nm
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$286 U.S.$515 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7200Intel Core 2 Duo T7800

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T7800 +
2663 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T7800 +
5014 Points (7%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1674     avg: 1720     median: 1717 (4%)     max: 1757 Points
2258 Points (5%)
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 228     avg: 233     median: 235 (90%)     max: 236 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 25     avg: 25.8     median: 25.5 (6%)     max: 27 s
19 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 62     avg: 63.5     median: 62.5 (3%)     max: 66 s
47 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1585     avg: 1591     median: 1591 (7%)     max: 1597 s
1203 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 12234     avg: 18153     median: 18153 (9%)     max: 24072 MIPS
23563 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 8806     avg: 11683     median: 11683 (9%)     max: 14560 MFLOPS
16641 MFLOPS (13%)
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 591     avg: 598     median: 592 (41%)     max: 610 Points
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T7200 +
2091 Points (86%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T7200 +
2018 Points (91%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 5372     avg: 6325     median: 6472 (87%)     max: 6903 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 2864     avg: 4013     median: 4002 (25%)     max: 5006 Points
6634 Points (42%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T7800 +
4393 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 → 125% n=7

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 12. 00:51:32

#0 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 339 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#40 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0s ... 0.007s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.008s

#42 got single benchmarks 168 +0.041s ... 0.049s

#43 getting avg benchmarks for device 339 +0s ... 0.049s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.05s

#45 got single benchmarks 339 +0.008s ... 0.057s

#46 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.057s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.058s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.06s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.067s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#98 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.068s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.024s ... 0.092s

#100 return log +0.004s ... 0.096s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)