Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

Intel Core 2 Duo T7250

► remove

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 war zur Zeit des Erscheinens ein Mittelklasse Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den älteren Merom Kern (später von dem schnelleren Penryn Kern abgelöst) und bietet die nur den halbierten Level 2 Cache mit 2 MB. Wie der T7200 bietet der T7250 Virtualization VT-x Funktionen, jedoch ist der T7200 aufgrund des 4 MB Cache etwas schneller (trotz des langsameren FSB). Durch die geringere Kernspannung, dürfte der T7250 jedoch etwas sparsamer sein.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

► remove

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 war zur Zeit des Erscheinens ein Mittelklasse Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den älteren Merom Kern (später von dem schnelleren Penryn Kern abgelöst) und bietet die vollen 4 MB Level 2 Cache und Virtualization VT-x Funktionen.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7250Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
Intel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
MeromMerom
: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 (compare)2600 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 (compare)2400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 (compare)2330 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 (compare)2200 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 (compare)2160 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 (compare)2200 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 (compare)2100 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 (compare)2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 (compare)2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 (compare)2000 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72502000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 (compare)2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 (compare)1800 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 (compare)1800 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 (compare)1800 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 (compare)1830 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 (compare)1830 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 (compare)1660 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 (compare)1730 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 (compare)1600 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 (compare)1660 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 (compare)1600 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 (compare)1400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 (compare)1200 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 (compare)2600 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 (compare)2400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 (compare)2330 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 (compare)2200 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 (compare)2160 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 (compare)2200 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T73002000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 (compare)2100 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 (compare)2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 (compare)2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 (compare)2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 (compare)2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 (compare)1800 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 (compare)1800 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 (compare)1800 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 (compare)1830 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 (compare)1830 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 (compare)1660 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 (compare)1730 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 (compare)1600 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 (compare)1660 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 (compare)1600 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 (compare)1400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 (compare)1200 MHz2 / 2
2000 MHz2000 MHz
800800
2 MB4 MB
2 / 22 / 2
35 34
291 291
65 1.075V-1.175V65
143 mm2143 mm2
100 °C100 °C
PBGA479, PPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478
Virtualization, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization Technology VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
$234 U.S.

Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 1999     avg: 2061.7     median: 2072 (23%)     max: 2093 Points
min: 1971     avg: 2040     median: 2040 (22%)     max: 2109 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 3729     avg: 3770.8     median: 3762 (8%)     max: 3822 Points
min: 3600     avg: 3732.5     median: 3732 (8%)     max: 3865 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
45 seconds (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1621     avg: 1692.2     median: 1712 (12%)     max: 1751 Points
min: 1652     avg: 1722.4     median: 1739 (12%)     max: 1764 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - Standard 1280x1024
min: 1608     avg: 1663.5     median: 1663 (40%)     max: 1719 Points
min: 1194     avg: 1542.3     median: 1705 (41%)     max: 1728 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 1280x800
1618 Points (57%)
min: 1622     avg: 1712.3     median: 1733 (61%)     max: 1760 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 1152x864
min: 1691     avg: 1715     median: 1715 (83%)     max: 1739 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27     avg: 29.5     median: 29 (6%)     max: 32 Seconds
min: 23     avg: 23.7     median: 23 (5%)     max: 24 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 65     avg: 69.5     median: 69 (3%)     max: 74 Seconds
min: 56     avg: 58.2     median: 59 (3%)     max: 59 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1432     avg: 1544     median: 1544 (7%)     max: 1656 Seconds
min: 1433     avg: 1487.5     median: 1487 (7%)     max: 1542 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 18085     avg: 18213     median: 18213 (9%)     max: 18341 MIPS
18090 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 11961     avg: 12395     median: 12395 (10%)     max: 12829 MFLOPS
12664 MFLOPS (10%)
PCMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 3715     avg: 4316.9     median: 4366 (27%)     max: 4794 Points
min: 3396     avg: 4395.7     median: 4297 (27%)     max: 5250 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - CPU
4.9 Points (70%)
4.9 Points (70%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
3473 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 → 101%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 18.09.2017)