Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5870

Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 war zur Zeit des Erscheinens ein Mittelklasse Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den älteren Merom Kern (später von dem schnelleren Penryn Kern abgelöst) und bietet die vollen 4 MB Level 2 Cache und Virtualization VT-x Funktionen.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5870

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 ist ein Einstiegs Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den alten Merom Kern mit lediglich 2 MB Level 2 Cache. Er bietet keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und ist mit 2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7300Intel Core 2 Duo T5870
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz2000 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization Technology VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$234 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7300Intel Core 2 Duo T5870

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1971     avg: 2040     median: 2040 (17%)     max: 2109 Points
min: 1875     avg: 2092     median: 2088.5 (17%)     max: 2316 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3600     avg: 3733     median: 3732.5 (4%)     max: 3865 Points
min: 3480     avg: 3855     median: 3809.5 (4%)     max: 4319 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T5870 +
min: 1355     avg: 1916     median: 1915.5 (23%)     max: 2476 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T5870 +
min: 42.47     avg: 60     median: 60 (12%)     max: 77.6 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1194     avg: 1680     median: 1729 (4%)     max: 1764 Points
min: 1560     avg: 1606     median: 1628 (3%)     max: 1630 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23     avg: 23.7     median: 23.7 (5%)     max: 24.48 s
min: 26.78     avg: 27.4     median: 27 (6%)     max: 28.27 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 56     avg: 58.2     median: 59 (3%)     max: 59.7 s
min: 61.8     avg: 63.9     median: 63.9 (3%)     max: 66 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1433     avg: 1488     median: 1487.5 (7%)     max: 1542 s
1492 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
18090 MIPS (9%)
16620 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
12664 MFLOPS (10%)
12000 MFLOPS (9%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3396     avg: 4396     median: 4297.5 (27%)     max: 5250 Points
min: 3903     avg: 3926     median: 3925.5 (25%)     max: 3948 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7300 +
4.9 Points (70%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T5870 +
4.9 Points (63%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T7300 +
3473 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 → 97% n=9

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.19
log 29. 05:11:52

#0 checking url part for id 324 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 442 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.004s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 324 +0s ... 0.005s

#23 got single benchmarks 324 +0.035s ... 0.04s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 442 +0s ... 0.04s

#25 got single benchmarks 442 +0.008s ... 0.048s

#26 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.049s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.05s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.054s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.055s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.055s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.057s

#65 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.057s

#66 return log +0.004s ... 0.061s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)