Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5870
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 ► remove
Der Core 2 Duo T7500 ist ein Mittelklasse Core 2 Duo Prozessor (zur Zeit des Erscheinens sogar knapp High-End) der Merom basierenden Notebook Prozessoren. Dank 4 MB Level 2 Cache und 2.2 GHz zeigte er eine gute Anwendungs- und Spieleperformance.
Im Vergleich zu später veröffentlichten Prozessoren, positioniert sich der T7500 auf Höhe eines Core 2 Duo P7570 oder Turion II Ultra M640-M660 in der Mittelklasse ein. Spätere Core 2 Duo Prozessoren (Penryn) unterstützen jedoch einige Features mehr und sind daher etwas schneller und stomsparender.
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 ► remove
Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 ist ein Einstiegs Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den alten Merom Kern mit lediglich 2 MB Level 2 Cache. Er bietet keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und ist mit 2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet.
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 Intel Core 2 Duo Intel Core 2 Duo Merom Merom : Core 2 Duo Merom 2200 MHz 2000 MHz 800 800 128 KB 4 MB 2 MB 2 / 2 2 / 2 35 34 291 291 65 1.075 - 1.250V 65 1.075V-1.175V 143 mm2 143 mm2 100 °C 100 °C PBGA479, PPGA478 Virtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit $234 U.S. Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 Intel Core 2 Duo T5870
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.93 avg: 1 median: 1 (2%) max: 1.12 Points
Quadro FX 570M 0.93
Dell Latitude D830 Quadro NVS 140M 1.12
min: 0.93 avg: 1 median: 1 (2%) max: 1.12 Points
Quadro FX 570M 0.93
Dell Latitude D830 Quadro NVS 140M 1.12
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2190 avg: 2304 median: 2307.5 (24%) max: 2389
min: 1875 avg: 2092 median: 2088.5 (21%) max: 2316
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4182 avg: 4284 median: 4272.5 (7%) max: 4473
min: 3480 avg: 3855 median: 3809.5 (6%) max: 4319
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
37.5 s (8%)
min: 42.468 avg: 60 median: 60 (12%) max: 77.592 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1634 avg: 1879 median: 1906 (13%) max: 1940 Points
Aristo Vision i375+ GeForce 8600M GT 2048 512MB 1634
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 1791
Dell XPS M1730 GeForce 8700M GT SLI 2048 625 / MHz 256MB 1842
GeForce 8600M GT 2048 256MB 1878
Dell XPS M1330 LED-backlit LCD GeForce 8400M GS 1024 128MB 1878
Samsung X65 Bekumar GeForce 8600M GS 2048 500 / MHz 256MB 1892
Asus W2W Mobility Radeon HD 2600 2048 500 / MHz 256MB 1892
MSI Megabook GX700 GeForce 8600M GT 2048 475 / MHz 512MB 1906
Alb RS13 GeForce 8400M G 3072 400 / MHz 256MB 1906
Compal IFL90 GeForce 8600M GT 4096 513 / MHz 512MB 1908
GeForce 8600M GT 1911
HP Pavilion HDX9130eg Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT 2048 400 / MHz 256MB 1913
Maxdata Belinea b.book 5 GeForce 8400M GS 2048 297 / MHz 256MB 1914
Samsung X22-Pro Boyar Mobility Radeon HD 2400 2048 446 / MHz 128MB 1921
One C7000 Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT 2048 650 / MHz 256MB 1930
Quadro FX 360M 2048 400 / MHz 256MB 1940
min: 1560 avg: 1606 median: 1628 (11%) max: 1630 Points
Aristo Vision i375+ GeForce 8600M GT 2048 512MB 1634
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 1791
Dell XPS M1730 GeForce 8700M GT SLI 2048 625 / MHz 256MB 1842
GeForce 8600M GT 2048 256MB 1878
Dell XPS M1330 LED-backlit LCD GeForce 8400M GS 1024 128MB 1878
Samsung X65 Bekumar GeForce 8600M GS 2048 500 / MHz 256MB 1892
Asus W2W Mobility Radeon HD 2600 2048 500 / MHz 256MB 1892
MSI Megabook GX700 GeForce 8600M GT 2048 475 / MHz 512MB 1906
Alb RS13 GeForce 8400M G 3072 400 / MHz 256MB 1906
Compal IFL90 GeForce 8600M GT 4096 513 / MHz 512MB 1908
GeForce 8600M GT 1911
HP Pavilion HDX9130eg Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT 2048 400 / MHz 256MB 1913
Maxdata Belinea b.book 5 GeForce 8400M GS 2048 297 / MHz 256MB 1914
Samsung X22-Pro Boyar Mobility Radeon HD 2400 2048 446 / MHz 128MB 1921
One C7000 Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT 2048 650 / MHz 256MB 1930
Quadro FX 360M 2048 400 / MHz 256MB 1940
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 22 avg: 22.7 median: 23 (5%) max: 23 s
Maxdata Belinea b.book 5 GeForce 8400M GS 2048 297 / MHz 256MB 22
Asus W2W Mobility Radeon HD 2600 2048 500 / MHz 256MB 22.963
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 23
Compal IFL90 GeForce 8600M GT 4096 513 / MHz 512MB 23
min: 26.781 avg: 27.3 median: 27 (6%) max: 28.267 s
Maxdata Belinea b.book 5 GeForce 8400M GS 2048 297 / MHz 256MB 22
Asus W2W Mobility Radeon HD 2600 2048 500 / MHz 256MB 22.963
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 23
Compal IFL90 GeForce 8600M GT 4096 513 / MHz 512MB 23
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 54 avg: 54.6 median: 54.6 (2%) max: 55.271 s
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 54
Asus W2W Mobility Radeon HD 2600 2048 500 / MHz 256MB 55.271
min: 61.797 avg: 63.9 median: 63.9 (3%) max: 66 s
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 54
Asus W2W Mobility Radeon HD 2600 2048 500 / MHz 256MB 55.271
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1344 s (6%)
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 1344
1492 s (7%)
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 1344
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 19950 avg: 20064 median: 20063.5 (10%) max: 20177 MIPS
GeForce 8600M GT 2048 256MB 19950
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 20177
16620 MIPS (8%)
GeForce 8600M GT 2048 256MB 19950
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 20177
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 13944 avg: 13945 median: 13945 (11%) max: 13946 MFLOPS
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 13944
GeForce 8600M GT 2048 256MB 13946
12000 MFLOPS (9%)
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 13944
GeForce 8600M GT 2048 256MB 13946
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
5984 Points (80%)
Toshiba M9 Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 1024 5984
5984 Points (80%)
Toshiba M9 Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 1024 5984
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 2095 avg: 4545 median: 4629 (29%) max: 5785 Points
min: 3903 avg: 3926 median: 3925.5 (25%) max: 3948 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.1 Points (73%)
5.1 Points (73%)
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 → 100% n=13 Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 → 93% n=13
-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.15
log 26. 03:11:53
#0 checking url part for id 322 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 442 +0s ... 0s
#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 0 +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 25 Oct 2020 12:05:31 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#4 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 322 +0s ... 0.008s
#7 got single benchmarks 322 +0.038s ... 0.047s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 442 +0s ... 0.047s
#9 got single benchmarks 442 +0s ... 0.047s
#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.047s
#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.047s
#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.055s
#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.056s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.057s
#15 return log +0.005s ... 0.062s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Redaktion, 8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
-