, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P7550

Intel Core 2 Duo T9300

► remove from comparison Intel T9300

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks der Mittelklasse. Er gehört zur Penryn Serie und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der T9400 ist zwar ähnlich getaktet bietet jedoch einen höher getakteten FSB.

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo T9300 sollte für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Intel Core 2 Duo P7550

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Der P7550 ist baugleich zum Core 2 Duo P8400 und P7570, bietet jedoch keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen (VT-x) und keine Unterstützung für Trusted Execution Technology. Die Architektur des OEM Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 ausreichen. Im Vergleich zu AMD sollte die Performance auf Niveau der schnellsten Turion II Ultra mit 2.4 - 2.6 GHz liegen. Anspruchsvolle Spielefans sollten jedoch eher zu höher getakteten Core 2 Duo CPUs greifen (>2.5 GHz).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T9300Intel Core 2 Duo P7550
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2500 MHz2260 MHz
FSB8001066
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm1-1.25V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C90 °C
SocketBGA479, PGA478PGA478
FeaturesVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitEnhanced Speedstep, Intel 64, ExBit
Architecturex86x86
$316 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T9300Intel Core 2 Duo P7550

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2719     avg: 2823     median: 2799 (25%)     max: 3009 Points
2439 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4968     avg: 5230     median: 5189.5 (7%)     max: 5854 Points
4645 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
31.6 s (6%)
35.6 s (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P7550 +
1112 s (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2109     avg: 2249     median: 2257.5 (5%)     max: 2336 Points
2004 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 17     avg: 17.6     median: 17.9 (4%)     max: 18 s
22.7 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 43     avg: 43.4     median: 43.1 (2%)     max: 44 s
53.6 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1173 s (5%)
1278 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
23021 MIPS (11%)
17680 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
18370 MFLOPS (14%)
16630 MFLOPS (13%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4423     avg: 5707     median: 5899 (37%)     max: 6890 Points
4946 Points (31%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T9300 +
min: 4.8     avg: 5.3     median: 5.4 (77%)     max: 5.4 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T9300 +
min: 4554     avg: 4735     median: 4735 (5%)     max: 4916 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 → 91% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 24. 23:29:01

#0 checking url part for id 377 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 525 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:10:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 377 +0s ... 0.01s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.011s

#48 got single benchmarks 377 +0.028s ... 0.039s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 525 +0s ... 0.039s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#51 got single benchmarks 525 +0.005s ... 0.045s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.046s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.047s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.053s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#127 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#128 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.054s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#130 return log +0.004s ... 0.058s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)