, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300

Intel Core 2 Duo T9300

► remove from comparison Intel T9300

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks der Mittelklasse. Er gehört zur Penryn Serie und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der T9400 ist zwar ähnlich getaktet bietet jedoch einen höher getakteten FSB.

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo T9300 sollte für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300

► remove from comparison

Der Core 2 Duo SP9300 ist ein sparsamer Mittelklasse Doppelkernprozessor. Im Vergleich zu anderen Core 2 Duo Prozessoren mit 2.26 GHz, bietet der SP9300 den vollen 6MB Level 2 Cache des Penryn Kerns. Weiters sind alle Features des Kerns aktiviert (VT-x, Trusted Execution).

Dank der 6 MB Level 2 Cache, ist die Performance besser als bei gleichgetakteten Core 2 Duo Modellen (z.B. P8400).

 

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T9300Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2500 MHz2260 MHz
FSB8001066
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm1-1.25V45 nm1.05-1.15V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA479, PGA478BGA956
FeaturesVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution Technology, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$316 U.S.$284 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T9300Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2719     avg: 2823     median: 2799 (25%)     max: 3009 Points
min: 2508     avg: 2522     median: 2517 (22%)     max: 2541 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4968     avg: 5230     median: 5189.5 (7%)     max: 5854 Points
min: 4753     avg: 4759     median: 4757 (6%)     max: 4767 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
31.6 s (6%)
min: 35.95     avg: 52.7     median: 52.7 (11%)     max: 69.4 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 SP9300 +
min: 1145.88     avg: 1641     median: 1641.4 (19%)     max: 2137 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2109     avg: 2249     median: 2257.5 (5%)     max: 2336 Points
min: 1941     avg: 1996     median: 1974 (4%)     max: 2074 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 17     avg: 17.6     median: 17.9 (4%)     max: 18 s
min: 20.03     avg: 21     median: 21 (5%)     max: 22 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 43     avg: 43.4     median: 43.1 (2%)     max: 44 s
min: 47.237     avg: 47.6     median: 47.6 (2%)     max: 48 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1173 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
23021 MIPS (11%)
19380 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
18370 MFLOPS (14%)
16680 MFLOPS (13%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4423     avg: 5707     median: 5899 (37%)     max: 6890 Points
min: 4425     avg: 4480     median: 4480 (28%)     max: 4535 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T9300 +
min: 4.8     avg: 5.3     median: 5.4 (77%)     max: 5.4 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 SP9300 +
5.7 Points (73%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T9300 +
min: 4554     avg: 4735     median: 4735 (5%)     max: 4916 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 → 91% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 26. 00:37:14

#0 checking url part for id 377 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 421 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:10:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 377 +0s ... 0.009s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.01s

#48 got single benchmarks 377 +0.026s ... 0.036s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 421 +0s ... 0.036s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.037s

#51 got single benchmarks 421 +0.01s ... 0.047s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.047s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.047s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.048s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.055s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#119 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#125 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#130 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#131 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#138 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#139 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#140 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.057s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#142 return log +0.004s ... 0.061s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)