, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

Intel Core 2 Duo T9300

► remove from comparison Intel T9300

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks der Mittelklasse. Er gehört zur Penryn Serie und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der T9400 ist zwar ähnlich getaktet bietet jedoch einen höher getakteten FSB.

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo T9300 sollte für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 ist ein Einstiegsprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern, bietet jedoch nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache und ist mit 2.1 GHz relativ langsam getaktet. Im Vergleich zum vergleichbaren T6500, bietet der T6570 jedoch Virtualisierungsfunktionen VT-x.

Durch die mittelmäßige Taktfrequenz und den kleinen Level 2 Cache, kann die CPU bei modernen und anspruchsvollen Spielen durchaus limitieren (z.B. große Multiplayerschlachten bei Supreme Commander). Für die mittelmäßig anspruchsvolle (nicht professionelle) Anwendungen wie Office, Entry-Level Videoschnitt, Bildbearbeitung, Internet und casual Gaming sollte die Leistung jedoch ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T9300Intel Core 2 Duo T6570
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2500 MHz2100 MHz
FSB800800
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm1-1.25V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA479, PGA478PGA478
FeaturesVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$316 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T9300Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 T6570 +
1.2 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2719     avg: 2823     median: 2799 (25%)     max: 3009 Points
min: 1589     avg: 2167     median: 2274 (20%)     max: 2314 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4968     avg: 5230     median: 5189.5 (7%)     max: 5854 Points
min: 2963     avg: 4042     median: 4276 (6%)     max: 4284 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 T6570 +
4768 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 T6570 +
2462 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
31.6 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T6570 +
1170 s (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2109     avg: 2249     median: 2257.5 (5%)     max: 2336 Points
min: 1326     avg: 1751     median: 1820 (4%)     max: 1886 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 17     avg: 17.6     median: 17.9 (4%)     max: 18 s
min: 24     avg: 27.5     median: 25.1 (5%)     max: 36 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 43     avg: 43.4     median: 43.1 (2%)     max: 44 s
min: 57.892     avg: 66.5     median: 61 (3%)     max: 86 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1173 s (5%)
min: 1342     avg: 1534     median: 1344 (6%)     max: 1916 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
23021 MIPS (11%)
min: 15404     avg: 17907     median: 19000 (9%)     max: 19317 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
18370 MFLOPS (14%)
min: 10662     avg: 13404     median: 14160 (11%)     max: 15390 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4423     avg: 5707     median: 5899 (37%)     max: 6890 Points
min: 3419     avg: 4583     median: 4691 (29%)     max: 5134 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
min: 4.8     avg: 5.3     median: 5.4 (77%)     max: 5.4 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T6570 +
5 Points (64%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 4554     avg: 4735     median: 4735 (5%)     max: 4916 Points
min: 3764     avg: 3902     median: 3902 (4%)     max: 4040 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 → 88% n=12

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 20. 05:12:11

#0 checking url part for id 377 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 466 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:10:47 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 377 +0s ... 0.009s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.01s

#48 got single benchmarks 377 +0.032s ... 0.042s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 466 +0s ... 0.043s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.044s

#51 got single benchmarks 466 +0.014s ... 0.058s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.059s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.06s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#136 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#140 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#142 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#148 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#150 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#151 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#160 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#161 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#162 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#164 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.07s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#166 return log +0.004s ... 0.073s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)