Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

Intel Core 2 Duo T9550

► remove from comparison Intel T9550

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 Dual-Core CPU ist ein oberer Mittelklasse Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der T9550 ist vergleichbar mit dem teureren P9600, welcher jedoch auf einen TDP von 25 Watt spezifiziert ist (T9550 max. 35 Watt TDP).

Dank der 2.66 GHz und des großen Level 2 Cache von 6 MB (shared für alle beiden Kerne), ist die Anwendungsleistung für Single-Threaded Anwendungen und Spiele welche hauptsächlich einen Kern benutzen, sehr gut. Moderne Spiele, welche mehrere Threads benutzen, können jedoch von einem 4-Kerner deutlich mehr profitieren (z.B. ein Drittel mehr Leistung bei DIRT 2 beim Einsatz von 4 Kernen, siehe unseren Prozessorleistung und Spiele Artikel). In 2009 reichte die Performance des T9550 jedoch für eine flüssige Darstellung von allen Spielen (GTA4 ev. knapp) und auch anspruchsvolle Anwendungen kommen mit der Leistung gut aus.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Im Core 2 Duo T9550 wurden keine Features der Penryn Architektur deaktiviert. Daher unterstützt er 64 Bit, Virtualisierung und alle Stromsparfunktionen (z.B. C6 State).

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9550 passt in den Socket P (BGA479, PGA478).

Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

► remove from comparison Intel T9600

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 Dual-Core CPU ist ein High-End Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zum schnelleren T9900 unterstützt er jedoch noch nicht den C1E State. Der neuere Core 2 Duo P9700 bietet die selben Leistungsdaten, jedoch bei deutlich geringerem Stromverbrauch (28 W versus 35 Watt TDP).

Dank der relativ hohen Taktung von 2.8 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen geschlagen (da Spiele aus 2009 meist nicht mehr als 2 Kerne auslasten).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9900 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T9550Intel Core 2 Duo T9600
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2660 MHz2800 MHz
FSB10661066
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm1.05-1.212V45 nm1.05-1.2125 V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA479, PGA478Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)
FeaturesVirtualization, Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep (up to C6), ExBit, SSE4.1
Architecturex86x86
$316 U.S.$316 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T9550Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2911     avg: 2958     median: 2966 (26%)     max: 3001 Points
min: 3060     avg: 3204     median: 3106.5 (28%)     max: 3541 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5418     avg: 5530     median: 5577 (8%)     max: 5615 Points
min: 5538     avg: 5936     median: 5801 (8%)     max: 6785 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
922 s (11%)
min: 877     avg: 900     median: 899.5 (11%)     max: 922 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
29 s (6%)
min: 27     avg: 28.1     median: 27.7 (6%)     max: 29.7 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2347     avg: 2384     median: 2385 (5%)     max: 2417 Points
min: 2465     avg: 2524     median: 2517 (5%)     max: 2598 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 16     avg: 17     median: 17 (4%)     max: 17.91 s
min: 16     avg: 16.3     median: 16 (3%)     max: 16.98 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 40     avg: 41.6     median: 42 (2%)     max: 42.84 s
min: 39     avg: 39.8     median: 39.5 (2%)     max: 40.98 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1059     avg: 1105     median: 1123 (5%)     max: 1132 s
min: 1033     avg: 1052     median: 1034 (5%)     max: 1088 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 6820     avg: 17433     median: 20774 (10%)     max: 24706 MIPS
min: 25986     avg: 26074     median: 26073.5 (12%)     max: 26161 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 5870     avg: 14981     median: 19516 (15%)     max: 19556 MFLOPS
min: 19701     avg: 20127     median: 20126.5 (15%)     max: 20552 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 6414     avg: 6553     median: 6619 (42%)     max: 6625 Points
min: 5911     avg: 6761     median: 6798 (43%)     max: 7573 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
min: 3.9     avg: 5.1     median: 5.5 (79%)     max: 5.5 Points
5.6 Points (80%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 5252     avg: 5399     median: 5424 (6%)     max: 5496 Points
min: 5700     avg: 5703     median: 5703 (6%)     max: 5706 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 → 104% n=13

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 27. 19:48:47

#0 checking url part for id 449 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 397 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 449 +0s ... 0.008s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#48 got single benchmarks 449 +0.015s ... 0.024s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 397 +0s ... 0.025s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#51 got single benchmarks 397 +0.014s ... 0.038s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.039s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#125 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#128 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#129 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#130 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.047s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#132 return log +0.004s ... 0.051s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)