Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P7450

Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

► remove from comparison Intel T9600

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 Dual-Core CPU ist ein High-End Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zum schnelleren T9900 unterstützt er jedoch noch nicht den C1E State. Der neuere Core 2 Duo P9700 bietet die selben Leistungsdaten, jedoch bei deutlich geringerem Stromverbrauch (28 W versus 35 Watt TDP).

Dank der relativ hohen Taktung von 2.8 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen geschlagen (da Spiele aus 2009 meist nicht mehr als 2 Kerne auslasten).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9900 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo P7450

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Dank 25 Watt TDP, eignet sich der Notebook Prozessor auch für 13" Notebooks. Im Vergleich zu stärkeren Penryn Core 2 Duo, bietet der P7450 keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und keine Unterstützung für Trusted Execution Technology. 

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T9600Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2800 MHz2130 MHz
FSB10661066
L2 Cache6 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm, 1.05-1.2125 V45 nm, 1.05-1.15V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C90 °C
SocketSocket P (BGA479, PGA478)PGA478
Architecturex86x86
$316 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T9600Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3060     avg: 3204     median: 3106.5 (28%)     max: 3541 Points
min: 2242     avg: 2389     median: 2305.5 (21%)     max: 2575 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5538     avg: 5936     median: 5801 (8%)     max: 6785 Points
min: 4121     avg: 4473     median: 4373 (6%)     max: 4863 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 877     avg: 900     median: 899.5 (11%)     max: 922 s
min: 1230     avg: 1237     median: 1239 (15%)     max: 1243 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 27     avg: 28.1     median: 27.7 (6%)     max: 29.7 s
min: 35.9     avg: 38     median: 38.6 (8%)     max: 39 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2465     avg: 2524     median: 2517 (5%)     max: 2598 Points
min: 1845     avg: 1896     median: 1900 (4%)     max: 1938 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 16     avg: 16.3     median: 16 (3%)     max: 16.98 s
min: 22     avg: 23.5     median: 23.9 (5%)     max: 25 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 39     avg: 39.8     median: 39.5 (2%)     max: 40.98 s
min: 54     avg: 55.7     median: 55.4 (2%)     max: 59.6 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1033     avg: 1052     median: 1034 (5%)     max: 1088 s
min: 1334     avg: 1338     median: 1337.5 (6%)     max: 1341 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 25986     avg: 26074     median: 26073.5 (12%)     max: 26161 MIPS
min: 16477     avg: 18533     median: 19560 (9%)     max: 19563 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 19701     avg: 20127     median: 20126.5 (15%)     max: 20552 MFLOPS
min: 14460     avg: 14811     median: 14700 (11%)     max: 15272 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 5911     avg: 6761     median: 6798 (43%)     max: 7573 Points
min: 4809     avg: 5158     median: 5055 (32%)     max: 5712 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.6 Points (80%)
5.1 Points (73%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 P7450 +
5.7 Points (73%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 5700     avg: 5703     median: 5703 (6%)     max: 5706 Points
min: 3804     avg: 3918     median: 3918 (4%)     max: 4032 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 → 84% n=13

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 29. 18:58:59

#0 checking url part for id 397 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 445 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:14:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 397 +0s ... 0.009s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#48 got single benchmarks 397 +0.018s ... 0.028s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 445 +0s ... 0.029s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.029s

#51 got single benchmarks 445 +0.02s ... 0.05s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.05s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.051s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#124 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#131 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#132 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#133 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#135 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#139 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#140 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#142 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#143 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.059s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#145 return log +0.004s ... 0.063s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)