Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC Tangula T700 vs UNISOC T606

UNISOC Tangula T700

► remove from comparison  Tangula T700

Der Unisoc Tangula T700 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1.8 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. er bietet ähnliche Spezifikationen wie der Unisoc Tiger T618 bzw T610.

Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0. Zudem ist die Nutzung von 90-Hz-Bildschirmen möglich. Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP2 Grafikkarte bietet zwei Kerne und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

UNISOC T606

► remove from comparison  T606

Der Unisoc T606 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei großen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1,6 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit ebenfalls bis zu 1,6 GHz. Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0 (24, 8, 8 MPixel Support). Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR4/4X mit 1600 MHz. Die integrierte ARM Mali G57 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet einen Kerne und 650 MHz Taktung und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

ModelUNISOC Tangula T700UNISOC T606
Series
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A75 / A55
Serie: Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6061.6 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
» UNISOC Tangula T7001.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
» UNISOC T6061.6 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7001.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1800 - 1800 MHz1600 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm12 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPARM Mali G57 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP2ARM Mali-G57 MP1 (650 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
L3 Cache1 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Tangula T700
29.2 pt (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2815     avg: 2888     median: 2888 (36%)     max: 2961 Points
min: 2484     avg: 2556     median: 2537 (32%)     max: 2667 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2844     avg: 2903     median: 2902.5 (42%)     max: 2961 Points
min: 2489     avg: 2569     median: 2546 (37%)     max: 2673 Points
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 347     avg: 351.5     median: 351.5 (17%)     max: 356 Points
min: 273     avg: 302.4     median: 311 (15%)     max: 313 Points
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1291     avg: 1342     median: 1342 (5%)     max: 1393 Points
min: 708     avg: 1066     median: 1151 (4%)     max: 1185 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3722 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
10382 Points (11%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
65 Points (17%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
44936 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
37643 Points (30%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
36709 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
67597 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
186885 Points (18%)
155928 Points (15%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
2078 Points (0%)
1218 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
10033 Points (27%)
8373 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 8743     avg: 8745     median: 8744.5 (47%)     max: 8746 Points
min: 6721     avg: 7398     median: 7480 (40%)     max: 7912 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5412 Points (29%)
4923 Points (26%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
12328 Points (26%)
10422 Points (22%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
8438 Points (55%)
7100 Points (46%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.4 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 4     median: 4 (18%)     max: 8.02 Watt
012345678910Tooltip

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tangula T700 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T606 → 84% n=11

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 04. 23:16:34

#0 checking url part for id 13247 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14018 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.041s ... 0.046s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.048s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.048s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.05s

#15 getting avg benchmarks for device 13247 +0.003s ... 0.053s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.054s

#18 got single benchmarks 13247 +0.007s ... 0.061s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 14018 +0s ... 0.061s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.062s

#22 got single benchmarks 14018 +0.007s ... 0.069s

#23 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.069s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.07s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.075s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.076s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.079s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#70 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.089s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#72 return log +0.004s ... 0.093s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)