Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC Tangula T700 vs UNISOC T612

UNISOC Tangula T700

► remove from comparison  Tangula T700

Der Unisoc Tangula T700 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1.8 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. er bietet ähnliche Spezifikationen wie der Unisoc Tiger T618 bzw T610.

Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0. Zudem ist die Nutzung von 90-Hz-Bildschirmen möglich. Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP2 Grafikkarte bietet zwei Kerne und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

UNISOC T612

► remove from comparison  T612

Das Unisoc Tiger T612 ist ein SoC der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz Taktrate und 6 stromsparenden Cortex-A55-Kernen, ebenfalls mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. 

Das T612 kommt mit einem LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0. Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 933 MHz und LPDDR4/4X mit 1600 MHz.

Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet einen Kern, 16 Shading Units und 614 MHz Taktung. Hier liegt auch der einzige Unterschied zum Unisoc Tiger T610: Die Grafikkarte besitzt beim T612 einen Kern weniger.

Das Unisoc Tiger T612 wird bei TSMC im 12nm-FinFet-Prozess hergestellt.

ModelUNISOC Tangula T700UNISOC T612
Series
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A75 / A55
Serie: Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6121.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
» UNISOC Tangula T7001.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
» UNISOC T6121.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 81 MB Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7001.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1800 - 1800 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm12 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPARM Mali G52 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP2ARM Mali-G52 MP1 (614 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
L3 Cache1 MB
Manufacturer T612

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Tangula T700
29.2 pt (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2815     avg: 2888     median: 2888 (36%)     max: 2961 Points
104%
T612 +
2990 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2844     avg: 2903     median: 2902.5 (42%)     max: 2961 Points
101%
T612 +
2942 Points (43%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T612 +
5404 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T612 +
1598 Points (33%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 347     avg: 351.5     median: 351.5 (17%)     max: 356 Points
346 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1291     avg: 1342     median: 1342 (5%)     max: 1393 Points
1322 Points (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3722 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
10382 Points (11%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
65 Points (17%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
44936 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
37643 Points (30%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
36709 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
67597 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
186885 Points (18%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
2078 Points (0%)
143%
T612 +
2969 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
10033 Points (27%)
116%
T612 +
11681 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 8743     avg: 8745     median: 8744.5 (47%)     max: 8746 Points
7776 Points (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5412 Points (29%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
12328 Points (26%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
8438 Points (55%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.4 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 4     median: 4 (18%)     max: 8.02 Watt
012345678910Tooltip
103%
1 T612 +
3.4 Watt (15%)
0123456Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T612 +
1.1 Watt (4%)
00.20.30.50.60.80.91.11.21.41.61.71.922.22.32.52.62.83Tooltip

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tangula T700 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T612 → 107% n=7

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 02. 10:36:23

#0 checking url part for id 13247 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14386 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.044s ... 0.049s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.052s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.053s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.053s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.055s

#15 getting avg benchmarks for device 13247 +0.003s ... 0.058s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.06s

#19 got single benchmarks 13247 +0.006s ... 0.066s

#20 getting avg benchmarks for device 14386 +0s ... 0.067s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#22 got single benchmarks 14386 +0.005s ... 0.072s

#23 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.072s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.077s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.08s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.081s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.081s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.082s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.083s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.083s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.085s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.086s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.087s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.009s ... 0.096s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.007s ... 0.102s

#57 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.105s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#59 return log +0.004s ... 0.109s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)