Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5270

Intel Core 2 Duo U7600

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 ist ein Stromspar-Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks aus 2006. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern und punktet mit 64-Bit Unterstütztung und einem TDP von lediglich 10 Watt. Mit einer maximalen Taktrate von 1.2 GHz ist er die mittlere Variante der Core 2 Duo U7000 Serie (U7500 1.1 GHz).

Intel Core 2 Duo T5270

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für günstige Laptops. Er basiert auf den Merom-Kern, bietet jedoch keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen. Trotz der geringen Taktrate, ist er auf relativ hohe 35Watt TDP spezifiziert und eignet sich daher nicht für kleine Notebooks.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo U7600Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMerom-2048Merom-2048
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom-2048
Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5450 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 compare1.33 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U7500 compare1.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5450 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 compare1.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U7500 compare1.06 GHz2 / 2
Clock1200 MHz1400 MHz
FSB533800
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm0.8 - 0.975V65 nm1.075V-1.250V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479PPGA478
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo U7600Intel Core 2 Duo T5270

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1199     avg: 1263     median: 1263 (11%)     max: 1327 Points
1427 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2260     avg: 2289     median: 2289 (3%)     max: 2318 Points
2717 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 61.2     avg: 68.6     median: 68.6 (14%)     max: 76 s
65.8 s (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 U7600 +
min: 987     avg: 1008     median: 1008 (2%)     max: 1029 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
42.6 s (9%)
38.5 s (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5270 +
16817 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5270 +
6253 MFLOPS (5%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 U7600 +
min: 2253     avg: 2532     median: 2606 (16%)     max: 2738 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 U7600 +
4.4 Points (63%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 → 108% n=4

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 16. 14:35:17

#0 checking url part for id 347 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 441 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:13:41 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#16 composed specs +0s ... 0.004s

#17 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 347 +0s ... 0.004s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 got single benchmarks 347 +0.012s ... 0.017s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 441 +0s ... 0.017s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#23 got single benchmarks 441 +0.005s ... 0.022s

#24 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.027s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.028s

#42 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.028s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.021s ... 0.049s

#44 return log +0.004s ... 0.053s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)