Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5450

Intel Core 2 Duo U7600

Der Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 ist ein Stromspar-Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks aus 2006. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern und punktet mit 64-Bit Unterstütztung und einem TDP von lediglich 10 Watt. Mit einer maximalen Taktrate von 1.2 GHz ist er die mittlere Variante der Core 2 Duo U7000 Serie (U7500 1.1 GHz).

Intel Core 2 Duo T5450

► remove from comparison

OEM Prozessor

1.0375 - 1.3 V

MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64 (Intel's x86-64 implementation), XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), LaGrande Technology (Intel Trusted Execution Technology) Virtualization Technology

Die size: 111 mm²

Steppings: L2, M0

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo U7600Intel Core 2 Duo T5450
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMerom-2048Merom-2048
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom-2048
Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 compare1.33 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U7500 compare1.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 compare1.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U7500 compare1.06 GHz2 / 2
Clock1200 MHz1660 MHz
FSB533667
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million
Technology65 nm0.8 - 0.975V65 nm
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPBGA479
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo U7600

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1199     avg: 1263     median: 1263 (11%)     max: 1327 Points
min: 1015     avg: 1504     median: 1666 (15%)     max: 1669 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2260     avg: 2289     median: 2289 (3%)     max: 2318 Points
min: 1919     avg: 2827     median: 3121.5 (4%)     max: 3144 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 U7600 +
min: 61.2     avg: 68.6     median: 68.6 (14%)     max: 76 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 987     avg: 1008     median: 1008 (2%)     max: 1029 Points
min: 1344     avg: 1381     median: 1367 (3%)     max: 1433 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
42.6 s (9%)
min: 33.62     avg: 33.8     median: 33.9 (7%)     max: 34 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5450 +
15268 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5450 +
10407 MFLOPS (8%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 2253     avg: 2532     median: 2606 (16%)     max: 2738 Points
min: 3322     avg: 3505     median: 3501 (22%)     max: 3813 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
4.4 Points (63%)
4 Points (57%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5450 → 122% n=6

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 13. 10:41:58

#0 checking url part for id 347 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 336 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#16 composed specs +0s ... 0.004s

#17 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 347 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 got single benchmarks 347 +0.011s ... 0.016s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 336 +0s ... 0.017s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.017s

#23 got single benchmarks 336 +0.02s ... 0.037s

#24 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.04s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#61 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.044s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#63 return log +0.004s ... 0.048s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)