Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5270

Intel Core 2 Duo U7600

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 ist ein Stromspar-Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks aus 2006. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern und punktet mit 64-Bit Unterstütztung und einem TDP von lediglich 10 Watt. Mit einer maximalen Taktrate von 1.2 GHz ist er die mittlere Variante der Core 2 Duo U7000 Serie (U7500 1.1 GHz).

Intel Core 2 Duo T5470

► remove from comparison

65nm

Intel Core 2 Duo T5270

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für günstige Laptops. Er basiert auf den Merom-Kern, bietet jedoch keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen. Trotz der geringen Taktrate, ist er auf relativ hohe 35Watt TDP spezifiziert und eignet sich daher nicht für kleine Notebooks.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo U7600Intel Core 2 Duo T5470Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMerom-2048Merom-2048Merom-2048
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom-2048
Intel Core 2 Duo T54701.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 « 1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T54701.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1200 MHz1600 MHz1400 MHz
FSB533800800
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm, 0.8 - 0.975V65 nm65 nm, 1.075V-1.250V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479PPGA478
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 U7600 +
min: 1199     avg: 1263     median: 1263 (8%)     max: 1327 Points
113%
1 T5270 +
1427 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 U7600 +
min: 2260     avg: 2289     median: 2289 (2%)     max: 2318 Points
119%
1 T5270 +
2717 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 U7600 +
min: 61.2     avg: 68.6     median: 68.6 (14%)     max: 76 s
101%
1 T5270 +
65.8 s (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 U7600 +
min: 987     avg: 1008     median: 1008 (2%)     max: 1029 Points
135%
1 T5470 +
min: 1353     avg: 1365     median: 1364.5 (3%)     max: 1376 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
42.6 s (9%)
32 s (7%)
38.5 s (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5270 +
16817 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5270 +
6253 MFLOPS (5%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 U7600 +
min: 2253     avg: 2532     median: 2606 (5%)     max: 2738 Points
142%
1 T5470 +
min: 3508     avg: 3713     median: 3713 (8%)     max: 3918 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 U7600 +
4.4 Points (63%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 → 103% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 → 101% n=1

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 06:42:02

#0 checking url part for id 347 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 366 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 441 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.014s ... 0.015s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 347 +0.003s ... 0.017s

#8 got single benchmarks 347 +0.02s ... 0.038s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 366 +0.003s ... 0.04s

#10 got single benchmarks 366 +0.011s ... 0.051s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 441 +0.002s ... 0.053s

#12 got single benchmarks 441 +0.005s ... 0.059s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.059s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.045s ... 0.103s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.103s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)