Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs HiSilicon Kirin 910

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison  WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

HiSilicon Kirin 910

► remove from comparison

Der HiSilicon Kirin 910 ist ein ARM-basierter Quad-Core-SoC für (Android-)Smartphones und Tablets, der Anfang 2014 zusammen mit dem Huawei Ascend P6S vorgestellt wurde. Neben vier Cortex-A9-Kernen (max. 1,6 GHz) integriert der Chip auch eine Mali-450 MP4 Grafikeinheit, einen Single-Channel LPDDR3-1600-Speichercontroller sowie ein LTE Cat. 4 Modem. Einziger Unterschied zum Kirin 910T ist damit der 200 MHz niedrigere CPU-Takt.

Die CPU-Performance ordnet sich dank der hochtaktenden Cortex-A9-Kerne im Mittelfeld ein, sodass der 910T in etwa mit einem Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro (1,5 - 1,7 GHz Krait) vergleichbar ist. Dies genügt, um Browsing und andere typische Android-Anwendungen zügig zu bewältigen.

Die mit 533 MHz taktende Mali-450 MP4 sorgt für eine ansprechende Grafikleistung knapp auf dem Niveau der Qualcomm Adreno 320. Damit werden auch anspruchsvolle Android-Spiele in hoher Auflösung zumeist flüssig dargestellt.

Trotz Fertigung in einem aktuellen 28-Nanometer-Prozess (TSMC HPM) dürfte die Leistungsaufnahme des Kirin 910 nur durchschnittlich ausfallen, was auf die vergleichsweise hohen Taktraten zurückzuführen ist. Demzufolge kann der SoC in mittelgroßen Smartphones, aber auch Tablets eingesetzt werden.

ModelWonderMedia PRIZM WM8950HiSilicon Kirin 910
Series
CodenameCortex-A9Cortex-A9
Serie: Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
» WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
» HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
Clock1000 MHz1600 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 14 / 4
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturer WM8950
Technology28 nm
FeaturesARMv7, Mali-450 MP4 (533 MHz), LTE (Cat. 4), Single-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (6.4 GB/s)

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 9720     avg: 9785     median: 9784.5 (6%)     max: 9849 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 9766     avg: 9884     median: 9883.5 (8%)     max: 10001 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 8327     avg: 9920     median: 9920 (8%)     max: 11513 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
622 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1753 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
2784 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1575 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
1938 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1452     avg: 1548     median: 1547.5 (3%)     max: 1643 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 481     avg: 509     median: 509 (10%)     max: 537 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
202 MFLOPS (7%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
62.8 MFLOPS (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
22419 ms (26%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
2410 ms (23%)
1217 ms (12%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1277     avg: 1361     median: 1360.5 (15%)     max: 1444 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1467     avg: 1535     median: 1535 (2%)     max: 1603 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
874 Points (23%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1200 Points (27%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
1973 Points (26%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
2140 points (5%)
5563 points (13%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
min: 21467     avg: 21865     median: 21864.5 (51%)     max: 22262 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
537 Iter./s (17%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
11881 Iter./s (39%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
11258 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
2019 Points (10%)

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 910 → 299% n=4

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 16. 10:54:18

#0 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6344 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 13 May 2022 13:12:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.045s ... 0.049s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.053s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.054s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.054s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0s ... 0.054s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#19 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.005s ... 0.06s

#20 getting avg benchmarks for device 6344 +0s ... 0.06s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#22 got single benchmarks 6344 +0.006s ... 0.067s

#23 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.067s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.068s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.071s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.072s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.073s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.075s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.075s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.076s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.078s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.079s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.08s

#59 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.08s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#61 return log +0.004s ... 0.084s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)