Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-10320 vs Intel Core i7-10700K

Intel Core i3-10320

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10320

Der Intel Core i3-10320 ist ein Einstiegs-Desktop-Prozessor der Comet Lake-S Serie und wurde im 2. Quartal 2020 vorgestellt. Er bietet vier Kerne und acht Threads mit 3,8 - 4,6 GHz Taklung. Gefertigt wird der Intel Core i3-10320 weiterhin im 14-nm-Prozess.

Performance

In vielen Bereichen kann der kleine i3 mit dem alten Spitzenmodell, dem Core i7-7700K mithalten. Dieser bietet zwar einen etwas geringeren Maximaltakt, aber einen etwas höheren TDP.

Grafikeinheit

Wie schon zuvor bietet auch der Intel Core i5-10600K mit der Intel UHD Graphics 630 eine iGPU, welche sich aber aufgrund der geringen Leistung nicht für aufwendige Spiele eignet. Als Low-End-Lösung können aktuelle Videospiele, wenn überhaupt, lediglich in verminderter Detailstufe flüssig wiedergegeben werden. 

Leistungsaufnahme

Die TDP ist mit 65 Watt (Pl1) spezifiziert und daher für Desktop-CPUs relativ gering. Für 28s kann die CPU auch 90 Watt nutzen (PL2).

Intel Core i7-10700K

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core i7-10700K ist eine High-End-CPU mit zehn Kernen auf Basis der neuen Comet-Lake-Architektur, die Ende April 2020 bereits angekündigt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit 3,8-5,1 GHz und kann dank Hyperthreading bis zu 16 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Intel Core i7-10700K weiterhin im 14-nm-Prozess. Dank des freien Multiplikators lässt sich der Prozessor vergleichsweise einfach übertakten. Voraussetzung hierfür ist jedoch ein Mainboard mit dem Z490 Chipsatz.

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i7-9700K bietet der Core i7-10700K nun Hyperthreading, was bei Multi-Thread-Anwendungen für einen spürbaren Performance-Schub sorgt. Die Single-Core-Leistung bleibt nahezu unverändert auf dem Niveau des Core i7-9700K. Dank des TVB (Thermal Velocity Boost) kann der Intel Core i7-10700K bis zu 5,1 GHz auf einem Kern erreichen. Im Vergleich dazu kam der Core i7-9700K nur auf 4,9 GHz. Gleichwohl liegt der All-Core-Boost des Core i7-10700K noch bei 4,7 GHz. Allerdings spielen hierfür viele Faktoren eine Rolle (Art des Workloads, Anzahl aktiver CPU-Kerne, kalkulierte Stromstärke, kalkulierte Leistungsaufnahme, CPU-Temperatur). Das Top-Modell, der Intel Core i9-10900K legt hier sogar noch eine Schippe drauf und bietet einen All-Core-Boost von bis zu 4,9 GHz.

Grafikeinheit

Wie schon zuvor bietet auch der Intel Core i7-10700K mit der Intel UHD Graphics 630 eine iGPU, welche sich aber aufgrund der geringen Leistung nicht für aufwendige Spiele eignet. Als Low-End-Lösung können aktuelle Videospiele, wenn überhaupt, lediglich in verminderter Detailstufe flüssig wiedergegeben werden. 

Leistungsaufnahme

Hier hat Intel deutliche Veränderungen vorgenommen und dem Intel Core i7-10700K einen Spielraum von bis zu 229 Watt (PL2) unter Volllast eingeräumt. Die angegebene TDP von 125 Watt (PL1) wird in den meisten Fällen fast immer überschritten, was an den geänderten PL2 (229 Watt) sowie dem Tau-Wert (56 Sekunden) liegt. Beim Intel Corei7-9700K lag der PL2-Wert noch bei 156 Watt. Der Tau-Wert betrug zu seiner Zeit nur 28 Sekunden. Aufgrund der deutlich höheren Leistungsaufnahme sollte der Core i7-10700K nur mit einer sehr leistungsstarken Kühlung verwendet werden.

ModelIntel Core i3-10320Intel Core i7-10700K
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-SComet Lake-S
Serie: Comet Lake Comet Lake-S
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i7-10700K3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 1212 MB
» Intel Core i3-103203.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 87.9 MB
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 2020 MB
» Intel Core i7-10700K3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i3-103203.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 87.9 MB
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Clock3800 - 4600 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache7.9 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 16
TDP65 Watt125 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1200LGA 1200
FeaturesHyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630
Architecturex86x86
$162 U.S.$400 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Comet Lake i3-10320

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10320
40.5 pt (48%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10700K
52.4 pt (62%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5986 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1185 Points (58%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
458 Points (58%)
496 Points (63%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2320 Points (10%)
4882 Points (21%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
949 Points (10%)
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
2027 Points (21%)
01052103154205256307358409451050115512601365147015751680178518901995Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
188 Points (58%)
208 Points (64%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
10.5 Points (19%)
22.2 Points (41%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (7%)
2.4 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7164 Points (64%)
7910 Points (71%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
28383 Points (39%)
50670 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
64901 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10201 Points (62%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
85.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.2 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8469 Points (49%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
25864 MIPS (18%)
54050 MIPS (38%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4899 MIPS (59%)
5647 MIPS (68%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
58.8 fps (24%)
121 fps (50%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
218 fps (58%)
269 fps (72%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8.2 fps (18%)
01234567891011121314Tooltip
16.3 fps (35%)
05101520Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (0%)
2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.3 GB/s (0%)
11.2 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
469 Seconds (3%)
217.4 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
0.6 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9911 Points (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.7 s (2%)
7.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
516 s (2%)
391.3 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
10518 Points (36%)
18064 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63063 Points (41%)
72174 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
72375 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
74085 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
9675 Points (24%)
18637 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
13564 Points (31%)
24791 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4368 Points (23%)
10963 Points (59%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (54%)
min: 1371     avg: 1374     median: 1373.5 (60%)     max: 1376 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4846 Points (17%)
min: 8911     avg: 8925     median: 8925 (31%)     max: 8939 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1368 Points (62%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8903 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6247 Points (68%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
34735 Points (43%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
784 ms (1%)
747 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
160 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
224 Points (59%)
245 Points (65%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1254 Points (52%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
115 Watt (20%)
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
205 Watt (35%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
96.3 Watt (25%)
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
207.7 Watt (55%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.9 Points per Watt (11%)
9.8 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10320 → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10700K → 157% n=29

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 05. 17:38:01

#0 checking url part for id 14009 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12778 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:14:23 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 14009 +0.007s ... 0.016s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#22 got single benchmarks 14009 +0.007s ... 0.023s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.026s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.028s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#26 getting avg benchmarks for device 12778 +0s ... 0.028s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#28 got single benchmarks 12778 +0.009s ... 0.037s

#29 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.044s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.049s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.051s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.065s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.071s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.072s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.072s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.073s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.075s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.076s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.077s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.078s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.079s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.08s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.081s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.082s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.083s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.083s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.084s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.085s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.087s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.087s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.088s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.09s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.094s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.096s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.097s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#115 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.098s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#117 return log +0.004s ... 0.102s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)