Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-10320 vs Intel Core i9-10850K

Intel Core i3-10320

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10320

Der Intel Core i3-10320 ist ein Einstiegs-Desktop-Prozessor der Comet Lake-S Serie und wurde im 2. Quartal 2020 vorgestellt. Er bietet vier Kerne und acht Threads mit 3,8 - 4,6 GHz Taklung. Gefertigt wird der Intel Core i3-10320 weiterhin im 14-nm-Prozess.

Performance

In vielen Bereichen kann der kleine i3 mit dem alten Spitzenmodell, dem Core i7-7700K mithalten. Dieser bietet zwar einen etwas geringeren Maximaltakt, aber einen etwas höheren TDP.

Grafikeinheit

Wie schon zuvor bietet auch der Intel Core i5-10600K mit der Intel UHD Graphics 630 eine iGPU, welche sich aber aufgrund der geringen Leistung nicht für aufwendige Spiele eignet. Als Low-End-Lösung können aktuelle Videospiele, wenn überhaupt, lediglich in verminderter Detailstufe flüssig wiedergegeben werden. 

Leistungsaufnahme

Die TDP ist mit 65 Watt (Pl1) spezifiziert und daher für Desktop-CPUs relativ gering. Für 28s kann die CPU auch 90 Watt nutzen (PL2).

Intel Core i9-10850K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10850K

Der Intel Core i9-10850K ist eine High-End-CPU mit zehn Kernen auf Basis der neuen Comet-Lake-Architektur, die Ende April 2020 bereits angekündigt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit 3,6-5,2 GHz und kann dank Hyperthreading bis zu 20 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Intel Core i9-10850K weiterhin im 14-nm-Prozess. Dank des freien Multiplikators lässt sich der Prozessor vergleichsweise einfach übertakten. Voraussetzung hierfür ist jedoch ein Mainboard mit Z490 Chipsatz.

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i9-10900K ist der Intel Core i9-10850K nur minimal langsamer als ein Intel Core i9-10900K. Gleichwohl bietet der i9-10850K ebenfalls 10 Kerne und 20 Threads, was den Prozessor für intensive Workloads sehr attraktiv macht. Die schlechte Verfügbarkeit des Core i9-10900K war wohl einer der Hauptgründe, den Core i9-10850K ins Leben zu rufen. Neben der guten Systemleistung fühlt sich der Core i9-10850K auch beim Spielen pudelwohl.

Grafikeinheit

Wie schon das Top-Modell bietet auch der Intel Core i9-10850K mit der Intel UHD Graphics 630 eine iGPU. Aufgrund der geringen Leistung eignet sich diese allerdings nur für den 2D-Betrieb. Als Low-End-Lösung können aktuelle Videospiele, wenn überhaupt, lediglich in verminderter Detailstufe flüssig wiedergegeben werden. 

Leistungsaufnahme

Bei der Leistungsaufnahme sind sich die beiden Core i9-Modelle sehr ähnlich, was auch kein Wunder ist, denn rein technisch sind diese beiden Prozessoren identisch aufgebaut. Somit hat auch der Intel Core i9-10850K eine TDP von 125 Watt (PL1). Doch richtig energiehungrig wird der Prozessor erst, wenn der Boost zum Tragen kommt. Hier können es dann auch schon mal bis zu 250 Watt sein, wenn die Rahmenbedingungen stimmen.

ModelIntel Core i3-10320Intel Core i9-10850K
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-SComet Lake-S
Serie: Comet Lake Comet Lake-S
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10850K3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 1212 MB
» Intel Core i3-103203.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 87.9 MB
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 2020 MB
» Intel Core i9-10850K3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i3-103203.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 87.9 MB
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Clock3800 - 4600 MHz3600 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB640 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2.5 MB
L3 Cache7.9 MB20 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 810 / 20
TDP65 Watt125 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 12001200
FeaturesHyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630
Architecturex86x86
$162 U.S.$453 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Comet Lake i3-10320

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10320
40.5 pt (48%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10850K
58.3 pt (69%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5986 Points (10%)
15538 Points (25%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1185 Points (58%)
1314 Points (64%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
458 Points (58%)
511 Points (65%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2320 Points (10%)
5961 Points (25%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
949 Points (10%)
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
2457 Points (25%)
0125250375500625750875100011251250137515001625175018752000212522502375Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
188 Points (58%)
215 Points (66%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
10.5 Points (19%)
28.1 Points (52%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (7%)
2.5 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7164 Points (64%)
6829 Points (61%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
28383 Points (39%)
58453 Points (80%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
76123 Points (63%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6828 Points (42%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
68.1 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9424 Points (55%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
25864 MIPS (18%)
70932 MIPS (50%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4899 MIPS (59%)
5914 MIPS (71%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
58.8 fps (24%)
146.5 fps (61%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
218 fps (58%)
285.5 fps (76%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8.2 fps (18%)
01234567891011121314Tooltip
20.3 fps (44%)
051015202530Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
1.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (0%)
2.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.3 GB/s (0%)
14.5 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
469 Seconds (3%)
181.2 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
0.5 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9911 Points (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.7 s (2%)
7.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
516 s (2%)
419.8 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
10518 Points (36%)
22639 Points (78%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63063 Points (41%)
72388 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
72353 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
73572 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
9675 Points (24%)
19764 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
13564 Points (31%)
28058 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4368 Points (23%)
14278 Points (76%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (54%)
1401 Points (62%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4846 Points (17%)
11436 Points (40%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1412 Points (64%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11426 Points (36%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6425 Points (70%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
44146 Points (54%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
784 ms (1%)
717 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
160 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
224 Points (59%)
253 Points (67%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1254 Points (52%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
115 Watt (20%)
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
302.2 Watt (52%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
96.3 Watt (25%)
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
259.3 Watt (69%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.9 Points per Watt (11%)
9.5 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10320 → 100% n=31

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10850K → 184% n=31

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 05. 17:50:38

#0 checking url part for id 14009 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13162 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:14:23 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.007s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 14009 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#22 got single benchmarks 14009 +0.006s ... 0.021s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.024s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.025s

#26 getting avg benchmarks for device 13162 +0s ... 0.026s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#28 got single benchmarks 13162 +0.007s ... 0.033s

#29 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.04s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.044s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.05s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.059s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.063s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.064s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.066s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.068s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.069s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.07s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.071s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.071s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.074s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.076s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.079s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.08s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.085s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.088s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.089s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#113 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.089s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#115 return log +0.004s ... 0.093s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)