Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core i5-10400H vs Intel Core i7-10850H

Intel Core i5-10400H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400H

Der Intel Core i5-10400H ist ein Quad-Core-SoC für Notebooks, der auf der Comet-Lake-Architektur (4. Generation der Skylake Architektur) basiert. Er taktet die vier Prozessorkerne mit 2,6 - 4,6 GHz (4,4 GHz wenn alle 4 Kerne ausgelastet sind).  Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics 630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und kann wahrscheinlich vom Notebookhersteller auf 35 Watt heruntergesetzt werden (configurable TDP = cTDP Down).

Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Comet Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und auch die Fertigung ist im Vergleich zu Coffee Lake die selbe (14nm++). Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet. Der integrierte Speichercontroller unterstützt nun DDR4-2933.

Der i5-10400H unterstützt die Businessfeatures vPro, TXT und SIPP.

Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der i5-10400H am besten für große und schwere Notebooks, per "configurable TDP-down" kann die CPU auch mit 35 Watt betrieben werden, bei geringerer Leistung (Turbo wird nicht so lange gehalten).

Intel Core i7-10850H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10850H

Der Intel Core i7-10850H ist ein Sechskern-SoC für Notebooks, der auf der auf der Comet-Lake-Architektur basiert (CML-H, 4. Generation der Skylake Architektur). Er taktet die sechs Prozessorkerne mit 2,7 - 5,1 GHz (Ein- und Zweikern Turbo, alle 6 Kerne maximal 4,4 GHz). 5,1 GHz erreicht er nur mittels Thermal Velocity Boost und Turbo Boost 3.0. Rein mit Turbo Boost 3.0 sind 4,9 GHz auf einem Kern möglich. Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics 630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und kann vom Notebookhersteller auf 35 Watt heruntergesetzt werden (configurable TDP = cTDP Down).

Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Comet Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und auch die Fertigung ist im Vergleich zu Coffee Lake die selbe (14nm++). Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet. Der integrierte Speichercontroller unterstützt nun DDR4-2933.

Der i7-10850H unterstützt die Businessfeatures vPro, TXT und SIPP.

Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der i7-10850H am besten für große und schwere Notebooks. Optional kann er per Configurable TDP-down auf 35 Watt gedrosselt werden (mit dadurch geringerer Leistung).

ModelIntel Core i5-10400HIntel Core i7-10850H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-HComet Lake-H
Serie: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
» Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
» Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Clock2600 - 4600 MHz2700 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 86 / 12
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Comet Lake i5-10400HIntel Comet Lake i7-10850H
$395 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400H
40.8 pt (48%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10850H
45.5 pt (53%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
471 Points (61%)
494 Points (64%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1924 Points (8%)
2636 Points (11%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
796 Points (8%)
04080120160200240280320360400440480520560600640680720760Tooltip
1232 Points (13%)
065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
192 Points (66%)
203 Points (70%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.6 Points (18%)
12.2 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (62%)
2.3 Points (64%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7403 Points (66%)
7653 Points (68%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
25731 Points (35%)
34586 Points (47%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
801 s (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
24.9 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4115 Points (24%)
5519 Points (32%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
23136 MIPS (16%)
30988 MIPS (22%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4766 MIPS (68%)
5241 MIPS (75%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
49.1 fps (22%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
191.4 fps (52%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.1 fps (13%)
0123456789101112Tooltip
8.4 fps (18%)
01234567891011121314Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.6 GB/s (19%)
0.8 GB/s (28%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (20%)
1.3 GB/s (27%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.3 GB/s (20%)
7.8 GB/s (29%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
565 Seconds (4%)
425 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9578 Points (20%)
9471 Points (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.1 s (2%)
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
484.5 s (2%)
431.6 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
8007 Points (28%)
10694 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
7254 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
14601 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4313 Points (23%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1245 Points (61%)
1305 Points (64%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4332 Points (15%)
5753 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
787 ms (1%)
737 ms (1%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
67.4 Watt (12%)
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
75.9 Watt (20%)
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.5 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400H → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10850H → 120% n=24

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 25. 05:05:03

#0 checking url part for id 11958 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11960 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 23 May 2022 13:12:29 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.012s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 11958 +0s ... 0.012s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#26 got single benchmarks 11958 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.016s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.018s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#30 getting avg benchmarks for device 11960 +0s ... 0.018s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#32 got single benchmarks 11960 +0.008s ... 0.027s

#33 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.028s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.033s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.007s ... 0.04s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.011s ... 0.056s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.012s ... 0.068s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.068s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.069s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.07s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.072s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.072s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.073s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.074s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.074s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.075s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.075s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.076s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.077s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.083s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.087s

#90 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.088s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.025s ... 0.112s

#92 return log +0.004s ... 0.116s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)