Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-9300HF vs Intel Core i7-9850H

Intel Core i5-9300HF

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9300HF

Der Intel Core i5-9300HF ist ein Quad-Core-SoC für Notebooks, der auf der Coffee-Lake-Architektur (Refresh in 2019 CFL-HR) basiert. Er taktet die vier Prozessorkerne mit 2,4 - 4,1 GHz (Ein- und Zweikern Turbo) bzw. maximal 4 GHz wenn alle Kerne ausgelastet sind. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und kann wahrscheinlich vom Notebookhersteller auf 35 Watt heruntergesetzt werden (configurable TDP = cTDP Down). Im Vergleich zum Vorgänger dem Core i5-8300H wurde nur der Takt um 100 MHz erhöht, sonst gibt es keine Unterschiede.

Im Vergleich zum Core i5-9300H, ist die Grafikkarte im 9300HF deaktiviert und nicht verfügbar.

Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Coffee Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und Coffee Lake kann nur durch die leicht verbesserte Fertigung (14nm++) und die zusätzlichen Kerne punkten. Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet.

Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der i5-9300HF am besten für große und schwere Notebooks, per "configurable TDP-down" kann die CPU auch mit 35 Watt betrieben werden, bei geringerer Leistung (Turbo wird nicht so lange gehalten).

Intel Core i7-9850H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-9850H

Der Intel Core i7-9850H ist ein Sechskern-SoC für Notebooks, der auf der auf der Coffee-Lake-Architektur basiert und Anfang 2018 vorgestellt wird. Er taktet die sechs Prozessorkerne mit 2,6 - 4,6 GHz (Ein- und Zweikern Turbo) bzw. maximal 4 GHz wenn alle Kerne ausgelastet sind. Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics 630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und kann vom Notebookhersteller auf 35 Watt heruntergesetzt werden (configurable TDP = cTDP Down). Im Vergleich zum Vorgänger dem Core i7-8850H wurden nur die Taktfrequenzen erhöht, sonst gibt es keine Unterschiede.

Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Coffee Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und Coffee Lake kann nur durch die leicht verbesserte Fertigung (14nm++) und die zusätzlichen Kerne punkten. Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet.

Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der i7-9850H am besten für große und schwere Notebooks. Optional kann er per Configurable TDP-down auf 35 Watt gedrosselt werden (mit dadurch geringerer Leistung).

ModelIntel Core i5-9300HFIntel Core i7-9850H
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-HCoffee Lake-H
Serie: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Xeon E-2186M compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Xeon E-2276M compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Xeon E-2176M compare2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 129 MB
Intel Core i7-8750H compare2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 129 MB
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 88 MB
» Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-9300H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-8400H compare2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i3-8100H compare3 GHz4 / 48 MB
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Xeon E-2186M compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Xeon E-2276M compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 1212 MB
» Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Xeon E-2176M compare2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 129 MB
Intel Core i7-8750H compare2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 129 MB
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-9300H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-8400H compare2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i3-8100H compare3 GHz4 / 48 MB
Clock2400 - 4100 MHz2600 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 86 / 12
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
Architecturex86x86
$250 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Coffee Lake i5-9300HF
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-9850H
44.4 pt (52%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 425     avg: 439.5     median: 439.5 (57%)     max: 454 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1800     avg: 2114     median: 2114 (9%)     max: 2428 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1114     avg: 1205     median: 1230 (13%)     max: 1272 Points
065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 192     avg: 193.8     median: 193 (66%)     max: 196.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
12.5 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7169 Points (64%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31938 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
42090 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9224 Points (56%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
278 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8.3 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5621 Points (33%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 25786     avg: 29714     median: 31087 (22%)     max: 32268 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5020     avg: 5066     median: 5086 (73%)     max: 5092 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
68.3 fps (31%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
201.3 fps (55%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7     avg: 8.4     median: 9 (19%)     max: 9.1 fps
01234567891011121314151617Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (26%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.2 GB/s (25%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.4 GB/s (27%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 411     avg: 459.3     median: 415 (3%)     max: 552 Seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9137     avg: 10056     median: 10056 (21%)     max: 10975 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
467.6 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 26292     avg: 34763     median: 37665 (38%)     max: 40333 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 9987     avg: 11361     median: 11512 (40%)     max: 12585 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 54664     avg: 57802     median: 56870 (37%)     max: 61872 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8390     avg: 9853     median: 9841 (25%)     max: 11328 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14059     avg: 15802     median: 15330 (38%)     max: 18016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4588     avg: 5605     median: 5953 (32%)     max: 6275 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1090 Points (53%)
1150 Points (56%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4370 Points (15%)
5270 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1135     avg: 1169     median: 1169 (59%)     max: 1203 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5353     avg: 5620     median: 5619.5 (18%)     max: 5886 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4447 Points (51%)
min: 5320     avg: 5509     median: 5594 (65%)     max: 5614 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
14512 Points (18%)
min: 18098     avg: 22010     median: 23715 (29%)     max: 24218 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5376 Points (83%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
20077 Points (49%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1010     avg: 1018     median: 1015 (1%)     max: 1028 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 38630     avg: 39090     median: 39091 (40%)     max: 39548 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9300HF → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9850H → 129% n=4

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 16. 12:45:26

#0 checking url part for id 12136 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11350 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 12136 +0s ... 0.01s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#26 got single benchmarks 12136 +0.007s ... 0.016s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.019s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.021s

#29 getting avg benchmarks for device 11350 +0.002s ... 0.023s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.026s

#32 got single benchmarks 11350 +0.01s ... 0.036s

#33 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.036s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.014s ... 0.051s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.017s ... 0.074s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.075s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.075s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.076s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.077s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.077s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.078s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.079s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.079s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.08s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.08s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.081s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.082s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.082s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.083s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.084s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.084s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.086s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.087s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.088s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.088s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.089s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#114 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.089s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.02s ... 0.11s

#116 return log +0.004s ... 0.114s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)