, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core i7-9700K vs Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i7-9700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-9700K

Der Intel Core i7-9700K ist eine High-End-CPU mit acht Kernen auf Basis der Coffee Lake-Architektur, die im Oktober 2018 zusammen mit dem Intel Core i9-9900K und dem Intel Core i5-9600K vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit 3,6-4,9 GHz und kann insgesamt bis zu 8 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Inter Core i7-9700K im verbesserten 14-nm-Prozess (14nm++). Dank des freien Multiplikators lässt sich der Prozessor vergleichsweise einfach übertakten. Voraussetzung hierfür ist jedoch ein Mainboard mit Z390 Chipsatz, sowie eine sehr gute Kühlung.

Performance

Durch die zwei zusätzlichen Rechenkerne steigt die Performance bei Ausnutzung aller Kerne im Vergleich zum Core i7-8700K nur leicht, da dem Intel Core i7-9700K kein Hypertreading zur Verfügung steht. Die Single-Core-Leistung konnte aufgrund der erhöhten Turbotaktraten leicht gesteigert werden. Als High-End-Modell ist der i7-9700K auch für anspruchsvollste Anwendungen und primär für Videospiele geeignet.

Grafikeinheit

Die nun als Intel UHD Graphics 630 bezeichnete iGPU taktet mit 1.200 MHz genauso schnell wie zuvor. Somit ist kein nennenswerter Performancevorteil zu erwarten. Als Low-End-Lösung können aktuelle Videospiele, wenn überhaupt, lediglich in verminderter Detailstufe flüssig wiedergegeben werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Intel beziffert die Thermal Design Power (TDP) auf 95 Watt. Entsprechend dimensionierte Kühlsysteme dürften die entstehende Abwärme im Normalbetrieb problemlos abführen können. Beim Übertakten gönnt sich die CPU aber schnell 200 Watt und mehr. Hier sollte eine deutlich leistungsstärkere Kühlung zum Einsatz kommen.

Intel Core i5-9400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400F

Der Intel Core i5-9400F ist ein Desktop-Prozessor mit sechs Kernen auf Basis der Coffee Lake-Architektur, die im Oktober 2018 zusammen mit dem Flaggschiff Intel Core i9-9900K vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit 2,9-4,1 GHz und kann insgesamt bis zu 6 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Intel Core i5-9400F im verbesserten 14-nm-Prozess (14nm++).

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-8400 konnte die Leistung nur leicht gesteigert werden. Leistungszuwächse um bis zu 10 Prozent können erwartet werden. Beide Prozessoren (alt und neu) bieten weiterhin kein Hyperthreading. Das Leistungsplus summiert sich somit nur auf kleinen Architekturverbesserungen und einem etwas höheren Basis- und Turbotakt. Für den Büroalltag eignet sich diese CPU, welche aufgrund der geringen Abwärme auch keine großen Kühler benötigt. Aber auch Spiele zählen zu den Anwendungsgebieten, denn in Spielen schlägt der Intel Core i5-9400F den Intel Core i3-9100F deutlich. Hier zahlen sich die sechs Kerne inzwischen aus. 

Grafikeinheit

Beim Intel Core i5-9400F handelt es sich um einen Prozessor ohne integrierte Grafikeinheit. Wer auf eine iGPU Wert legt sollte sich den Intel Core i5-9400 genauer anschauen. Dieser bietet als iGPU eine Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Leistungsaufnahme

Intel beziffert die Thermal Design Power (TDP) auf 65 Watt. Somit Bedarf es keiner großen Kühlsysteme, was auch den Einbau in sehr kompakten Gehäusen ermöglicht.

ModelIntel Core i7-9700KIntel Core i5-9400F
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-RCoffee Lake-R
Serie: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
» Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 812 MB
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 812 MB
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 69 MB
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 69 MB
Intel Core i3-9100F compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 812 MB
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 812 MB
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 69 MB
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 1616 MB
» Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 69 MB
Intel Core i3-9100F compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 46 MB
Clock3600 - 4900 MHz2900 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB9 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 86 / 6
TDP95 Watt65 Watt
14++ nm14 nm100
Die Size178 mm2149 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFCLGA1151LGA 1151-2
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$385 U.S.$182 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Coffee Lake i7-9700K

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9400F
41.8 pt (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
475 Points (62%)
416 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3250 Points (14%)
2378 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1433     avg: 1449     median: 1449 (15%)     max: 1465 Points
075150225300375450525600675750825900975105011251200127513501425Tooltip
984 Points (10%)
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 203     avg: 206     median: 205.5 (72%)     max: 208 Points
173 Points (60%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
15.8 Points (29%)
11.3 Points (21%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (68%)
2 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7624     avg: 7653     median: 7653 (68%)     max: 7682 Points
6490 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 42677     avg: 42778     median: 42777.5 (58%)     max: 42878 Points
31523 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
53600 Points (48%)
40065 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9774 Points (61%)
8182 Points (51%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
120 s (1%)
199 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.5 s (1%)
6.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7396 Points (47%)
5794 Points (37%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
25639 MIPS (18%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4678 MIPS (67%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
94.9 fps (43%)
64 fps (29%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
270 fps (73%)
234 fps (64%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
13 fps (28%)
05101520Tooltip
9.1 fps (19%)
012345678910111213141516Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (27%)
0.5 GB/s (18%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.3 GB/s (27%)
0.9 GB/s (18%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8.1 GB/s (30%)
5.2 GB/s (19%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
307 Seconds (2%)
469 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12844     avg: 13016     median: 12928 (28%)     max: 13447 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.7 s (2%)
9.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.4 s (1%)
20.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
421 s (2%)
500 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 53605     avg: 54313     median: 54484 (56%)     max: 54680 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14489     avg: 15025     median: 14657 (52%)     max: 16091 Points
11185 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81711     avg: 82658     median: 82294 (53%)     max: 83908 Points
70546 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 83615     avg: 83781     median: 83781 (75%)     max: 83947 Points
70482 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 81896     avg: 84164     median: 84164 (77%)     max: 86432 Points
72413 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12856     avg: 13012     median: 13018 (33%)     max: 13171 Points
8275 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18241     avg: 18437     median: 18332 (46%)     max: 18780 Points
12616 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7736     avg: 7954     median: 7875 (43%)     max: 8349 Points
5777 Points (31%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
27774 Points (49%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4825 Points (99%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5744 Points (89%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
26471 Points (64%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5925     avg: 5984     median: 5984 (69%)     max: 6043 Points
5347 Points (62%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 28792     avg: 29226     median: 29225.5 (36%)     max: 29659 Points
21830 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1132 Points (58%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5698 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1300 Points (64%)
1139 Points (56%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7440 Points (26%)
5715 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
948 ms (1%)
867 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
41962 Points (57%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
211 Points (60%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
222 Watt (38%)
132 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
203 Watt (54%)
123 Watt (33%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
7.1 Points per Watt (8%)
8 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9700K → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400F → 81% n=35

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 25. 01:46:32

#0 checking url part for id 11116 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12197 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:10:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 11116 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 got single benchmarks 11116 +0.011s ... 0.02s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 12197 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#21 got single benchmarks 12197 +0.006s ... 0.03s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.031s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.008s ... 0.04s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.044s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.01s ... 0.062s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.009s ... 0.071s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.073s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.075s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.076s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.077s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.078s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.079s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.08s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.082s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.083s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.084s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.086s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.087s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.088s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.089s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.089s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.09s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.091s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.092s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.092s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.093s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.095s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#144 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.095s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#146 return log +0.004s ... 0.1s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)