Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core i9-10885H vs Intel Core i5-10200H

Intel Core i9-10885H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10885H

Der Intel Core i9-10885H ist ein Achtkern-SoC für Notebooks, der auf der auf der Comet-Lake-Architektur basiert (CML-H, 4. Generation der Skylake Architektur). Er taktet die acht Prozessorkerne mit 2,4 GHz bis 5,3 GHz oder höher (Ein- und Zweikern Turbo, bis jetzt nicht bestätigt). Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics 630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und kann vom Notebookhersteller auf 35 Watt heruntergesetzt werden (configurable TDP = cTDP Down).

Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Comet Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und auch die Fertigung ist im Vergleich zu Coffee Lake die selbe (14nm++). Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet. Der integrierte Speichercontroller unterstützt nun DDR4-2933.

Der i9-10885H unterstützt die Businessfeatures vPro, TXT und SIPP.

Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der i9-10885H am besten für große und schwere Notebooks. Optional kann er per Configurable TDP-down auf 35 Watt gedrosselt werden (mit dadurch geringerer Leistung).

Intel Core i5-10200H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10200H

Der Intel Core i5-10200H ist ein Quad-Core-SoC für Notebooks, der auf der Comet-Lake-Architektur (4. Generation der Skylake Architektur) basiert. Er taktet die vier Prozessorkerne mit 2,4 - 4,1 GHz.  Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics 630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und kann vom Notebookhersteller auf 35 Watt heruntergesetzt werden (configurable TDP = cTDP Down).

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-9300H der Vorgängergeneration ist der einzige Unterschied der Support für schnelleren DDR4 Speicher (2933 vs 2666 MHz). Dadurch sollte die Performance nur minimal schneller sein als ein Core i5-9300H

Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Comet Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und auch die Fertigung ist im Vergleich zu Coffee Lake die selbe (14nm++). Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet. Der integrierte Speichercontroller unterstützt nun DDR4-2933.

Der i5-10200H unterstützt kein vPro, TXT und SIPP, für diese Business Features ist z.B. der Core i5-10400H mit 100-200 MHz höheren Taktfrequenzen geeignet.

Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der i5-10200H am besten für große und schwere Notebooks, per "configurable TDP-down" kann die CPU auch mit 35 Watt betrieben werden, bei geringerer Leistung (Turbo wird nicht so lange gehalten).

ModelIntel Core i9-10885HIntel Core i5-10200H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-HComet Lake-H
Serie: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
» Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
» Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Clock2400 - 5300 MHz2400 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache16 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 8
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$556 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Comet Lake i9-10885HIntel Comet Lake i5-10200H

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10885H
50.2 pt (59%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10200H
38.2 pt (45%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 8802     avg: 9438     median: 9438 (15%)     max: 10074 Points
5372 Points (9%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 CPU (Single Core)
min: 1284     avg: 1290     median: 1289.5 (64%)     max: 1295 Points
1089 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 460     avg: 487.3     median: 489 (63%)     max: 513 Points
419 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2798     avg: 3400     median: 3639 (15%)     max: 3762 Points
2082 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1264     avg: 1502     median: 1517 (16%)     max: 1726 Points
09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
842 Points (9%)
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 197     avg: 206.7     median: 211 (72%)     max: 212 Points
171.6 Points (59%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
131.2 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6420 Points (37%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 36740     avg: 40519     median: 41823 (30%)     max: 42993 MIPS
21148 MIPS (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5397     avg: 5551     median: 5589 (80%)     max: 5668 MIPS
4497 MIPS (64%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
80.5 fps (36%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
217.8 fps (59%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 10.6     avg: 11.5     median: 11.3 (24%)     max: 12.5 fps
05101520Tooltip
6.5 fps (14%)
0123456789Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (37%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.9 GB/s (37%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 283     avg: 311     median: 302 (2%)     max: 348 Seconds
515 Seconds (4%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.564     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.572 sec
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12101 Points (26%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
433.9 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12279     avg: 14604     median: 14291 (50%)     max: 17242 Points
6233 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
31296 Points (20%)
51050 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
30997 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 11176     avg: 12814     median: 12814 (32%)     max: 14452 Points
7729 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17249     avg: 19483     median: 20594 (51%)     max: 20606 Points
10760 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6510     avg: 7798     median: 8203 (44%)     max: 8682 Points
3613 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5672     avg: 5676     median: 5675.5 (65%)     max: 5679 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 26114     avg: 29009     median: 29009 (36%)     max: 31904 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1234     avg: 1281     median: 1280.5 (65%)     max: 1327 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6598     avg: 7172     median: 7172 (23%)     max: 7746 Points
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1216     avg: 1303     median: 1317 (64%)     max: 1376 Points
min: 1093     avg: 1094     median: 1094 (54%)     max: 1095 Points
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6529     avg: 7045     median: 6914 (24%)     max: 7693 Points
min: 3564     avg: 3845     median: 3845 (13%)     max: 4126 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 730     avg: 738     median: 734 (1%)     max: 749 ms
882 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
58398 Points (60%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 233     avg: 234.3     median: 234 (65%)     max: 236 Points
187.3 Points (52%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 78.1     avg: 103.7     median: 116.4 (20%)     max: 116.6 Watt
99.5 Watt (17%)
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 125.2     avg: 131.2     median: 126 (33%)     max: 142.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
4.9 Watt (18%)
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 10.1     avg: 11.5     median: 10.7 (12%)     max: 13.7 Points per Watt
77 Points per Watt (89%)
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10885H → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10200H → 74% n=20

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 21. 08:26:13

#0 checking url part for id 11962 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12747 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 18 May 2022 13:12:25 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.014s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#26 getting avg benchmarks for device 11962 +0s ... 0.015s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.016s

#28 got single benchmarks 11962 +0.016s ... 0.031s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.033s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.035s

#31 getting avg benchmarks for device 12747 +0s ... 0.035s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#33 got single benchmarks 12747 +0.009s ... 0.045s

#34 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.046s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.031s ... 0.079s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.085s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.087s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.087s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.014s ... 0.105s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.01s ... 0.115s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.116s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.116s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.117s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.117s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.117s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.118s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.119s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.12s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.12s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.121s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.122s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.123s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.123s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.124s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.125s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.126s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.127s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.128s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.128s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.129s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.129s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.13s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.13s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.131s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.131s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.132s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.133s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.134s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.14s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.14s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.007s ... 0.147s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#142 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.152s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.152s

#144 return log +0.004s ... 0.156s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)