, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core i9-9900KS vs Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i9-9900KS

► remove from comparison Intel i9-9900KS

Der Intel Core i9-9900KS ist eine High-End-CPU mit acht Kernen auf Basis der Coffee-Lake-Architektur, die im Oktober 2019 vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit 4,0-5,0 GHz und kann dank Hyperthreading bis zu 16 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird das Inter Core i9-9900KS weiterhin im 14-nm-Prozess (14nm++). Dank des freien Multiplikators lässt sich der Prozessor vergleichsweise einfach übertakten. Voraussetzung hierfür ist jedoch ein Mainboard mit Z390 Chipsatz.

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i9-9900K hält der Core i9-9900KS auch unter last die 5,0 GHz auf allen acht Kernen, was die Leistung weiter steigert. Der Leistungszuwachs beträgt im Vergleich zum letzjährigen Intel Core i9-9900K mit ca. 10 Prozent. Der noch ältere Core i7-8700K kann je nach Anwendung um ca. 45 Prozent abgehängt werden. Als High-End-Modell ist der i9-9900KS auch für anspruchsvollste Anwendungen und Videospiele geeignet.

Grafikeinheit

Die nun als Intel UHD Graphics 630 bezeichnete iGPU taktet mit 1.200 MHz genauso schnell wie zuvor. somit ist kein nennenswerter Performancevorteil zu erwarten. Als Low-End-Lösung können aktuelle Videospiele, wenn überhaupt, lediglich in verminderter Detailstufe flüssig wiedergegeben werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Intel erhöht die Thermal Design Power auf 127 Watt um die zusätzliche Leistung garantieren zu können. Entsprechend dimensionierte Kühlsysteme dürften die entstehende Abwärme im Normalbetrieb problemlos abführen können. Beim Übertakten gönnt sich die CPU aber schnell 200 Watt und mehr. Hier sollte eine deutlich leistungsstärkere Kühlung zum Einsatz kommen.

Intel Core i5-9400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400F

Der Intel Core i5-9400F ist ein Desktop-Prozessor mit sechs Kernen auf Basis der Coffee Lake-Architektur, die im Oktober 2018 zusammen mit dem Flaggschiff Intel Core i9-9900K vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit 2,9-4,1 GHz und kann insgesamt bis zu 6 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Intel Core i5-9400F im verbesserten 14-nm-Prozess (14nm++).

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-8400 konnte die Leistung nur leicht gesteigert werden. Leistungszuwächse um bis zu 10 Prozent können erwartet werden. Beide Prozessoren (alt und neu) bieten weiterhin kein Hyperthreading. Das Leistungsplus summiert sich somit nur auf kleinen Architekturverbesserungen und einem etwas höheren Basis- und Turbotakt. Für den Büroalltag eignet sich diese CPU, welche aufgrund der geringen Abwärme auch keine großen Kühler benötigt. Aber auch Spiele zählen zu den Anwendungsgebieten, denn in Spielen schlägt der Intel Core i5-9400F den Intel Core i3-9100F deutlich. Hier zahlen sich die sechs Kerne inzwischen aus. 

Grafikeinheit

Beim Intel Core i5-9400F handelt es sich um einen Prozessor ohne integrierte Grafikeinheit. Wer auf eine iGPU Wert legt sollte sich den Intel Core i5-9400 genauer anschauen. Dieser bietet als iGPU eine Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Leistungsaufnahme

Intel beziffert die Thermal Design Power (TDP) auf 65 Watt. Somit Bedarf es keiner großen Kühlsysteme, was auch den Einbau in sehr kompakten Gehäusen ermöglicht.

ModelIntel Core i9-9900KSIntel Core i5-9400F
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-RCoffee Lake-R
Serie: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
» Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 812 MB
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 812 MB
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 69 MB
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 69 MB
Intel Core i3-9100F compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 812 MB
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 812 MB
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 69 MB
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 1616 MB
» Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 69 MB
Intel Core i3-9100F compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 46 MB
Clock4000 - 5000 MHz2900 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB9 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 166 / 6
TDP127 Watt65 Watt
14 nm14 nm100
Die Size178 mm2149 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFCLGA1151LGA 1151-2
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$513 U.S.$182 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Coffee Lake i9-9900KS

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9900KS
56.1 pt (66%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9400F
41.8 pt (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 509     avg: 512     median: 511.5 (67%)     max: 514 Points
416 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4463     avg: 4820     median: 4819.5 (20%)     max: 5176 Points
2378 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1962     avg: 2058     median: 2058 (21%)     max: 2154 Points
01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
984 Points (10%)
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 215     avg: 216     median: 216 (76%)     max: 217 Points
173 Points (60%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 22.31     avg: 23.1     median: 23.1 (43%)     max: 23.98 Points
11.3 Points (21%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.43     avg: 2.5     median: 2.4 (70%)     max: 2.46 Points
2 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8143     avg: 8183     median: 8183 (73%)     max: 8223 Points
6490 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 50462     avg: 51779     median: 51778.5 (71%)     max: 53095 Points
31523 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
69169 Points (61%)
40065 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10759 Points (67%)
8182 Points (51%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 81.977     avg: 87.9     median: 87.9 (1%)     max: 93.79 s
199 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.232     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 3.969 s
6.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 8156     avg: 8353     median: 8353 (54%)     max: 8550 Points
5794 Points (37%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 55064     avg: 55735     median: 55735 (39%)     max: 56406 MIPS
25639 MIPS (18%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5674     avg: 5734     median: 5734 (82%)     max: 5794 MIPS
4678 MIPS (67%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 116     avg: 123     median: 122.5 (55%)     max: 129 fps
64 fps (29%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 276.16     avg: 279     median: 278.8 (76%)     max: 281.5 fps
234 fps (64%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 15.315     avg: 16.3     median: 16.3 (35%)     max: 17.2 fps
05101520Tooltip
9.1 fps (19%)
012345678910111213141516Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (41%)
0.5 GB/s (18%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (44%)
0.9 GB/s (18%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 12.1     avg: 12.2     median: 12.2 (45%)     max: 12.2 GB/s
5.2 GB/s (19%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 205.1     avg: 225     median: 224.6 (2%)     max: 244 Seconds
469 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14825     avg: 14884     median: 14883.5 (32%)     max: 14942 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.405     avg: 7.4     median: 7.4 (2%)     max: 7.436 s
9.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.449     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (1%)     max: 16.589 s
20.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 412.229     avg: 414     median: 414.1 (2%)     max: 416.054 s
500 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 18531     avg: 18914     median: 18694 (66%)     max: 19517 Points
11185 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 75473     avg: 75482     median: 75482 (49%)     max: 75491 Points
70546 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 75946     avg: 76061     median: 76060.5 (68%)     max: 76175 Points
70482 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 74085     avg: 75802     median: 75508 (69%)     max: 77813 Points
72413 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 19068     avg: 19770     median: 20049 (51%)     max: 20193 Points
8275 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24327     avg: 25511     median: 26016 (66%)     max: 26191 Points
12616 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 11017     avg: 11358     median: 11375 (62%)     max: 11683 Points
5777 Points (31%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
6313 Points (98%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
35932 Points (88%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6308 Points (73%)
5347 Points (62%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
35586 Points (44%)
21830 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1132 Points (58%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5698 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1372 Points (67%)
1139 Points (56%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
9100 Points (32%)
5715 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
883 ms (1%)
867 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
44538 Points (60%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
211 Points (60%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
260 Watt (45%)
132 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 219.3     avg: 269     median: 292.7 (77%)     max: 295.38 Watt
123 Watt (33%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 7.29     avg: 8.1     median: 8.1 (9%)     max: 8.95 Points per Watt
8 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9900KS → 100% n=37

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400F → 72% n=37

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 23. 07:17:59

#0 checking url part for id 11553 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12197 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:10:47 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.012s

#17 getting avg benchmarks for device 11553 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#19 got single benchmarks 11553 +0.009s ... 0.025s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.027s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.029s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 12197 +0s ... 0.03s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#24 got single benchmarks 12197 +0.006s ... 0.036s

#25 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.038s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.007s ... 0.046s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.05s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.009s ... 0.07s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.01s ... 0.08s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.081s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.081s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.082s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.084s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.084s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.085s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.086s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.086s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.087s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.088s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.09s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.09s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.096s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.097s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.101s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.102s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.102s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#150 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.105s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.023s ... 0.127s

#152 return log +0.004s ... 0.131s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)