Notebookcheck Logo

Notebook, Smartphone, Tablet Vergleich - Beta

Mit folgender Suchbox können Sie nach Notebook, Tablet und Smartphone Modellen suchen um die Spezifikationen und Testergebnisse hier zu vergleichen. Weiters kann man auch in unserer Suche und in den Test selbst (unter den Spezifikationen) Modelle auswählen, die vorgemerkt werden.

Modell:

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G

Test Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Smartphone – Mehr Power im neuen Handymodell by Florian Schmitt
Samsung Galaxy A52s

Realme 8

Test realme 8 Smartphone – Ohne schnelles Internet das bessere Handy? by Florian Schmitt
realme 8
6144 MB
128 GB
unknown: 7
6.50-inch
2400x1080
189 g
159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4
Wh
449 Euro
#984 Mediatek Helio G95 » 126%
#771 ARM Mali-G76 MP4 » 109%
4096 MB » 67%
128 GB » 100%
unknown: 7
6.40-inch » 98%
2400x1080 » 100%
177 g » 94%
160.6 x 73.9 x 8 » 94%
Wh
220 Euro » 49%

Datenblatt

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Galaxy A55 Serie)
Prozessor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Hauptspeicher
6 GB 
Bildschirm
6.50 Zoll 20:9, 2400 x 1080 Pixel 405 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, spiegelnd: ja, 120 Hz
Massenspeicher
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 102 GB verfügbar
Anschlüsse
1 USB 2.0, Audio Anschlüsse: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Helligkeitssensor, Sensoren: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, compass
Netzwerk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Abmessungen
Höhe x Breite x Tiefe (in mm): 8.4 x 159.9 x 75.1
Akku
4500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Laden
Schnellladen / Quick Charge
Betriebssystem
Android 11
Kamera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, OIS, LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​30fps (Camera 1); 12.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 5.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3); 5.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.2, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Sonstiges
Lautsprecher: stereo speakers, Tastatur: virtual keyboard, 15W-Charger, USB-Cabel, SIM-Needle, 24 Monate Garantie, IP67-certified; SAR: 0.878 W/​kg (head), 0.842W/​kg (body); A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS , Lüfterlos, Wasserdicht
Gewicht
189 g
Preis
449 Euro

 

Datenblatt

Realme 8 (8 Serie)
Prozessor
Mediatek Helio G95 8 x 2 - 2.1 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Grafikkarte
Hauptspeicher
4 GB 
Bildschirm
6.40 Zoll 20:9, 2400 x 1080 Pixel 411 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Super AMOLED, 180Hz sampling rate, spiegelnd: ja, 60 Hz
Massenspeicher
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108 GB verfügbar
Anschlüsse
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Anschlüsse: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Sensoren: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Netzwerk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM, UMTS, LTE (B1/2/5/7/8/17/18/20/26/38/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Abmessungen
Höhe x Breite x Tiefe (in mm): 8 x 160.6 x 73.9
Akku
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 30 Watt Dart Charge
Laden
Schnellladen / Quick Charge
Betriebssystem
Android 11
Kamera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/​1.79, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​30fps (Cam 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.25, wide angle lens (Cam 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Cam 3); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, monochrome (Cam 4)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.45, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Sonstiges
Lautsprecher: mono speaker, Tastatur: virtual keyboard, quick charger, USB cable, SIM tool, silicone bumper, 24 Monate Garantie, Lüfterlos
Gewicht
177 g
Preis
220 Euro

 

751
cd/m²
746
cd/m²
769
cd/m²
747
cd/m²
736
cd/m²
764
cd/m²
743
cd/m²
739
cd/m²
763
cd/m²
Ausleuchtung des Bildschirms
getestet mit X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximal: 769 cd/m² (Nits) Durchschnitt: 750.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.56 cd/m²
Ausleuchtung: 96 %
Helligkeit Akku: 736 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Schwarzwert: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
138.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
607
cd/m²
592
cd/m²
628
cd/m²
606
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
634
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
621
cd/m²
Ausleuchtung des Bildschirms
getestet mit X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximal: 634 cd/m² (Nits) Durchschnitt: 607.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.156 cd/m²
Ausleuchtung: 92 %
Helligkeit Akku: 590 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Schwarzwert: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.64 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
90.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.265
ERROR no Specs ID specified in element or header and also no heat ID found in element
ERROR no Specs ID specified in element or header and also no heat ID found in element
No Loudness Data found for specs ID 324662
No Loudness Data found for specs ID 322504
Stromverbrauch
Aus / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.4 / 1.7 Watt
Last midlight 3.6 / 6.9 Watt
 color bar
Legende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Derzeit nutzen wir das Metrahit Energy, ein professionelles TRMS Leistungs-Multimeter und PQ Analysator, für unsere Messungen. Mehr Details zu dem Messgerät finden Sie hier. Alle unsere Testmethoden beschreiben wir in diesem Artikel.
Warning: No power consumption data found
Akkulaufzeit
Idle (ohne WLAN, min Helligkeit)
31h 37min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 29min
Last (volle Helligkeit)
5h 9min
Akkulaufzeit
WiFi Websurfing
17h 19min

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G - 31.08.2022 v7
Redaktion

Gehäuse
87%
Tastatur
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
94%
Konnektivität
51 / 70 → 73%
Gewicht
89%
Akkulaufzeit
90%
Display
91%
Leistung Spiele
50 / 64 → 78%
Leistung Anwendungen
85 / 86 → 99%
Temperatur
87%
Lautstärke
100%
Audio
70 / 90 → 78%
Kamera
66%
Durchschnitt
79%
85%
Smartphone - gewichteter Durchschnitt
Weitere Informationen über unsere Bewertung finden Sie hier.

Realme 8 - 31.08.2022 v7
Redaktion

Gehäuse
82%
Tastatur
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
93%
Konnektivität
43 / 70 → 61%
Gewicht
90%
Akkulaufzeit
92%
Display
90%
Leistung Spiele
33 / 64 → 51%
Leistung Anwendungen
81 / 86 → 95%
Temperatur
84%
Lautstärke
100%
Audio
68 / 90 → 76%
Kamera
58%
Durchschnitt
75%
82%
Smartphone - gewichteter Durchschnitt
Weitere Informationen über unsere Bewertung finden Sie hier.

Pro

+gute Leistung
+schneller und heller Bildschirm
+IP-Zertifizierung
+lange Laufzeiten
+3,5mm-Port und USB-C für Audio nutzbar
 

Contra

-lahmes Ladegerät im Lieferumfang
-kein Update-Versprechen
-langsamer Speicher
-mäßige Empfangsstärke

Pro

+gute Leistung
+ordentliche Laufzeiten
+helles AMOLED-Display
+leicht und handlich
+schnelles Laden
 

Contra

-nur 60-Hz-Bildschirm
-hohe Erwärmung
-leichtes Drosseln unter Last
-PWM-Flackern
AndroBench 3-5 Random Write 4KB: 192.5 MB/s
AndroBench 3-5 Random Write 4KB: 133 MB/s » 69%
AndroBench 3-5 Random Read 4KB: 168.2 MB/s
AndroBench 3-5 Random Read 4KB: 144 MB/s » 86%
AndroBench 3-5 Sequential Write 256KB: 486.5 MB/s
AndroBench 3-5 Sequential Write 256KB: 187.8 MB/s » 39%
AndroBench 3-5 Sequential Read 256KB: 951 MB/s
AndroBench 3-5 Sequential Read 256KB: 526 MB/s » 55%
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests: 40619 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests: 38436 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 Memory Tests: 46173 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 Disk Tests: 26153 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests: 4322 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 System: 9547 Points
3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited: 687 Points
3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: 99.6 %
3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 690 Points
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test Stability: 98.9 %
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test Stability: 87.4 % » 88%
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited Score: 2485 Points
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited Score: 1502 Points » 60%
3DMark Wild Life Score: 2490 Points
3DMark Wild Life Score: 1493 Points » 60%
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics: 2539 Points
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics: 2656 Points » 105%
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics: 5263 Points
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics: 2878 Points » 55%
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited: 4250 Points
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited: 2826 Points » 66%
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics: 4664 Points
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics: 2914 Points » 62%
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics: 5591 Points
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics: 2712 Points » 49%
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited: 5355 Points
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited: 2754 Points » 51%
3DMark Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics: 4563 Points
3DMark Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics: 3323 Points » 73%
3DMark Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics: 7496 Points
3DMark Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics: 3285 Points » 44%
3DMark Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited: 6559 Points
3DMark Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited: 3293 Points » 50%
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics: 4444 Points
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics: 3228 Points » 73%
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics: 5140 Points
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics: 2633 Points » 51%
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1): 4967 Points
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1): 2745 Points » 55%
3DMark Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics: 4442 Points
3DMark Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics: 3222 Points » 73%
3DMark Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics: 7241 Points
3DMark Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics: 2398 Points » 33%
3DMark Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0: 6352 Points
3DMark Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0: 2542 Points » 40%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 T-Rex Onscreen: 108 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 T-Rex Offscreen: 132 fps
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Total: 1802 ms*
Octane V2 Total Score: 25119 Points
BaseMark OS II Web: 1359 Points
BaseMark OS II Graphics: 6783 Points
BaseMark OS II Memory: 4269 Points
BaseMark OS II System: 9089 Points
BaseMark OS II Overall: 4349 Points
GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Onscreen OGL: 69 fps
GFXBench 3.0 1080p Manhattan Offscreen: 77 fps
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal Overall Score: 1019 Points
GFXBench 3.1 Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen: 49 fps
GFXBench 3.1 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen: 56 fps
GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen: 19 fps
GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen: 12 fps » 63%
GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen: 13 fps
GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen: 7.7 fps » 59%
GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen: 30 fps
GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen: 19 fps » 63%
GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen: 34 fps
GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen: 21 fps » 62%
GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen: 28 fps
GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen: 33 fps
WebXPRT 3 Overall: 107 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Medium Native: 39.55 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Medium Offscreen : 45.96 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Simple Offscreen : 322.1 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 OpenGL Medium Native: 43.27 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 OpenGL Medium Offscreen : 48.57 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 OpenGL Simple Offscreen : 327.5 fps
AnTuTu v8 UX: 73226 Points
AnTuTu v8 MEM: 83639 Points
AnTuTu v8 GPU: 114681 Points
AnTuTu v8 CPU: 151051 Points
AnTuTu v8 Total Score: 422597 Points
Geekbench 5.5 OpenCL Score: 2359
Geekbench 5.5 OpenCL Score: 2314 » 98%
Geekbench 5.5 Vulkan Score: 2216
Geekbench 5.5 Vulkan Score: 2400 » 108%
Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core: 2808
Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core: 1689 » 60%
Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core: 771
Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core: 532 » 69%
AImark Score v2.x: 139024 Points
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android Overall Score NNAPI: 7622 Points
Antutu v9 UX: 103698 Points
Antutu v9 MEM: 70729 Points
Antutu v9 GPU: 135972 Points
Antutu v9 CPU: 127855 Points
Antutu v9 Total Score: 438254 Points
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT) SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: 71.8 MB/s
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT) SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: 71.7 MB/s » 100%
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT) SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: 25.9 MB/s
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT) SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: 35.8 MB/s » 138%
PCMark for Android Work 3.0: 12625 Points
PCMark for Android Work 3.0: 10373 Points » 82%
PCMark for Android Computer Vision score: 8000 Points
PCMark for Android Storage score: 16076 Points
PCMark for Android Work 2.0 performance score: 11645 Points
PCMark for Android Work 2.0 performance score: 9957 Points » 86%
JetStream 1.1 Total Score: 118.1 Points
Speedometer 2.0 Result: 53.2 runs/min
Jetstream 2 Total Score: 71.8 Points
Asphalt 9: Legends High Quality: 30 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends Standard / low: 30 fps
PUBG Mobile Smooth: 60 fps
PUBG Mobile HD: 40 fps
Armajet Deathmatch, 4vs4, Magma, Bots only: 99 fps
SD Card Reader JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs): 52.4 MB/s
Battery Runtime WiFi Websurfing: 721 min
Battery Runtime WiFi Websurfing: 1039 min » 144%
Response Times Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80%: 10 ms*
Response Times Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80%: 8 ms* » 80%
Response Times Response Time Black / White: 8 ms*
Response Times Response Time Black / White: 8 ms* » 100%
Response Times PWM Frequency: 231.5 Hz
Response Times PWM Frequency: 255.1 Hz » 110%
Loudspeakers Pink Noise: 83.6 dB(A)
Loudspeakers Pink Noise: 80.9 dB(A) » 97%
Networking iperf3 receive AX12: 425 MBit/s
Networking iperf3 receive AX12: 335 MBit/s » 79%
Networking iperf3 transmit AX12: 461 MBit/s
Networking iperf3 transmit AX12: 346 MBit/s » 75%
Power Consumption Idle 150cd/m2: 1.422 Watt*
Power Consumption Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: 4.28 Watt*
Power Consumption Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: 4.18 Watt*
Camera Testchart 1lux: 0
Camera Testchart 1lux: 0
Camera Testchart perfect light: 0
Camera Testchart perfect light: 0
Camera ColorChecker Passport 1lux DeltaE: 37.88 DeltaE*
Camera ColorChecker Passport 1lux DeltaE: 44.33 DeltaE* » 117%
Camera ColorChecker Passport perfect light DeltaE: 14.45 DeltaE*
Camera ColorChecker Passport perfect light DeltaE: 8.66 DeltaE* » 60%
* Geringere Werte sind besser.
Console
log 25. 16:53:24

#0 before search +0s ... 0s

#1 after search +0s ... 0s

#2 added compareJS +0s ... 0s

#3 looking up spec 324662 +0s ... 0s

#4 looking up spec 322504 +0s ... 0s

#5 more than one entry found +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 Galaxy A52s 5G for array +0.289s ... 0.293s

#7 8 for array +0.295s ... 0.587s

#8 return log +0s ... 0.588s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News >
Autor: Redaktion, 19.04.2012 (Update: 19.03.2019)