Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Mobile Sempron 3600+ vs AMD Mobile Sempron 4000+ vs AMD Mobile Sempron 3800+

AMD Mobile Sempron 3600+

► remove from comparison

Sockel S1, 65nm

AMD Mobile Sempron 4000+

► remove from comparison

Sockel S1, 65nm

AMD Mobile Sempron 3800+

► remove from comparison

Sockel S1, 65nm

ModelAMD Mobile Sempron 3600+AMD Mobile Sempron 4000+AMD Mobile Sempron 3800+
CodenameShermanShermanSherman
SeriesAMD Mobile SempronAMD Mobile SempronAMD Mobile Sempron
Serie: Mobile Sempron Sherman
AMD Mobile Sempron 4000+2.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD Mobile Sempron 3800+2.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD Mobile Sempron 3600+ « 2 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD Mobile Sempron 4000+ « 2.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD Mobile Sempron 3800+2.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD Mobile Sempron 3600+2 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD Mobile Sempron 4000+2.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD Mobile Sempron 3800+ « 2.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD Mobile Sempron 3600+2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock2000 MHz2200 MHz2200 MHz
FSB800800800
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB256 KB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 11 / 1
TDP25 Watt31 Watt31 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm65 nm
FeaturesMMX, Extended 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Cool'n'Quiet, NX-BitMMX, Extended 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Cool'n'Quiet, NX-BitMMX, Extended 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Cool'n'Quiet, NX-Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 3600+ +
2700 s (32%)
107%
1 3800+ +
2524 s (30%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 3600+ +
86 s (17%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 3600+ +
748 Points (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 3600+ +
49 s (11%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 3600+ +
2408 s (11%)
105%
1 3800+ +
2298 s (10%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 3800+ +
2147 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Mobile Sempron 3600+ → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Mobile Sempron 3800+ → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.35
log 02. 08:25:44

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 373 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 375 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 374 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1767338744s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 01 Jan 2026 05:18:32 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 373 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#9 got single benchmarks 373 +0.004s ... 0.006s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 375 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#11 got single benchmarks 375 +0s ... 0.007s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 374 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#13 got single benchmarks 374 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.014s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.014s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)