Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron M 560 vs Intel Celeron M 530

Intel Celeron M 560

Der Intel Celeron M 560 ist ein Einkernprozessor für billige Einsteiger-Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern, jedoch mit nur einem aktivierten Rechenkern. Er wurde jedoch funktionsmäßig stark abgespeckt und bietet z.B. auch weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Speedstep). Die Performance ist nur für anspruchslose Aufgaben ausreichend.

Intel Celeron M 530

► remove from comparison

Basierend auf den Merom kern mit 64 KB L1 Cache (32 KB Daten + 32 KB Instruktionen) und 1024 KB L2 Cache, der mit vollem Prozessortakt läuft.

Verbaut auf Sockel 479, AGTL+ mit 133 MHz (quadpumped 533 MHz)

ModelIntel Celeron M 560Intel Celeron M 530
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Celeron M Merom
Intel Celeron M 570 compare2.26 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 585 compare2.16 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 575 compare2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 550 compare2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 540 compare1.86 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 520 compare1.6 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 570 compare2.26 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 585 compare2.16 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 575 compare2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 550 compare2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 540 compare1.86 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 520 compare1.6 GHz1 / 1
Clock2130 MHz1730 MHz
FSB533533
L1 Cache64 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 1
TDP30 Watt30 Watt
Transistors291 Million
Technology65 nm0.95V-1.30V65 nm
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPPGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron M 560Intel Celeron M 530

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
560 +
2008 Points (18%)
80%
530 +
1615 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 560 +
2008 Points (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 530 +
739 Points (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
560 +
29.6 s (6%)
98%
530 +
38 s (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 560 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 530 → 89% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 20. 13:10:45

#0 checking url part for id 395 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 320 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 18 May 2022 13:12:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 395 +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 got single benchmarks 395 +0.007s ... 0.013s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 320 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#24 got single benchmarks 320 +0.007s ... 0.021s

#25 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.022s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.023s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#32 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.024s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.044s ... 0.067s

#34 return log +0.004s ... 0.071s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)