Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron M 560 vs Intel Celeron M 575 vs Intel Celeron M 585

Intel Celeron M 560

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron M 560 ist ein Einkernprozessor für billige Einsteiger-Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern, jedoch mit nur einem aktivierten Rechenkern. Er wurde jedoch funktionsmäßig stark abgespeckt und bietet z.B. auch weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Speedstep). Die Performance ist nur für anspruchslose Aufgaben ausreichend.

Intel Celeron M 575

► remove from comparison

er Intel Celeron M 575 ist ein Einkernprozessor für billige Einsteiger-Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern, jedoch mit nur einem aktivierten Rechenkern. Er wurde jedoch funktionsmäßig stark abgespeckt und bietet z.B. auch weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Speedstep). Die Performance ist nur für anspruchslose Aufgaben ausreichend.

Intel Celeron M 585

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron M 585 ist ein Einkernprozessor für billige Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern, jedoch mit nur einem aktivierten Rechenkern (sozusagen ein T3400 mit nur einem Kern). Er wurde jedoch funktionsmäßig stark abgespeckt und bietet z.B. auch weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Speedstep).

ModelIntel Celeron M 560Intel Celeron M 575Intel Celeron M 585
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Serie: Celeron M Merom
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1
Clock2130 MHz2000 MHz2160 MHz
FSB533667667
L1 Cache64 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 11 / 1
TDP30 Watt31 Watt31 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million291 Million
65 nm0.95V-1.30V65 nm0.95-1.365 nm0.95-1.30V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketPPGA478PPGA478PPGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-BitIntel64, Execute Disable BitEM64T, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron M 560Intel Celeron M 575Intel Celeron M 585
$86 U.S.$70 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
560 +
2008 Points (18%)
95%
575 +
min: 1914     avg: 1917     median: 1916.5 (17%)     max: 1919 Points
103%
585 +
2062 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
560 +
2008 Points (3%)
95%
575 +
min: 1914     avg: 1917     median: 1916.5 (3%)     max: 1919 Points
103%
585 +
2062 Points (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 575 +
min: 879     avg: 898     median: 898 (2%)     max: 917 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
560 +
29.6 s (6%)
100%
575 +
min: 24     avg: 28.9     median: 28.9 (6%)     max: 33.8 s
100%
585 +
31.4 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 575 +
54 s (2%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 560 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 575 → 97% n=3

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 585 → 102% n=3

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 04. 07:17:51

#0 checking url part for id 395 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 430 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 429 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.004s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#24 composed specs +0s ... 0.004s

#25 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#26 getting avg benchmarks for device 395 +0s ... 0.005s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#28 got single benchmarks 395 +0.006s ... 0.011s

#29 getting avg benchmarks for device 430 +0s ... 0.012s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#31 got single benchmarks 430 +0.006s ... 0.018s

#32 getting avg benchmarks for device 429 +0s ... 0.019s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#34 got single benchmarks 429 +0.005s ... 0.024s

#35 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#51 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.028s

#52 return log +0s ... 0.028s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)