Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Cortex-M4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2500 vs CSR8670

Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2500

► remove from comparison

Der Wear 2500 ist ein kleiner ARM Cortex-A7 Quad-Core für Smartwatches der die CPU-Kerne mit bis zu 1,2 GHz taktet. Der SoC wird in 28nm gefertigt und integriert ein X5 LTE Modem. Im Vergleich zum Wear 2100 bietet der 2500 Qualcomm Aqstic Audio Support.

ModelARM Cortex-M4Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2500CSR8670
Series Qualcomm
Serie:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHzcores
Apple A61 GHzcores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 «  cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 3100 - 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2500 « - 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2100 - 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A7
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHzcores
Apple A61 GHzcores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 « 0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
CodenameARM Cortex-A7
Clock <=1200 MHz80 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 42
Technology28 nm
FeaturesLPDDR3-400 Memory Controller, eMMC 4.5, USB 2.0, Beidou, Galileo, GLONASS, gPS, Adreno 304 GPU, Bluetooth 4.2
ArchitectureARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 04. 13:06:57

#0 checking url part for id 13222 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13232 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6793 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.114s ... 0.114s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.115s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13222 +0.003s ... 0.118s

#8 got single benchmarks 13222 +0.007s ... 0.124s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13232 +0.003s ... 0.127s

#10 got single benchmarks 13232 +0s ... 0.127s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 6793 +0.003s ... 0.13s

#12 got single benchmarks 6793 +0.006s ... 0.136s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.136s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.137s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.137s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)