Notebookcheck Logo

DK3.5+ST vs Apple S9 SiP

DK3.5+ST

► remove from comparison

Apple S9 SiP

Apple S9

Das Apple S9 SiP (System in a Package) ist ein 64-Bit-Prozessor mit zwei Kernen (Sawtooth Dual-Core) der in der Apple Watch Series 9 eingesetzt wird. Die beiden CPU-Kerne basieren auf die Architektur im Apple A15 SoC. Weiters beinhaltet der Chip erstmals eine Neural Engine (mit 4 Kernen) für AI Tasks.

Der S9 bietet 64 GB internen Speicher, L1 GPS, GNSS, Galileo und BaeiDou, WLAN 4 (802.11n), Bluetooth 5.3), und LTE / UMTS (optional). Ebenso ist der Ultrabreitband-Chip Apple U1 integriert.

Der Chip wird im modernen 4nm Prozess bei TSMC (N4P) hergestellt.

show full text
ModelDK3.5+STApple S9 SiP
SeriesHuawei Apple
Serie: Thunder
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST « 2 cores
unknown compare cores
Apple S9 SiP « 1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores Thunder
Apple S8 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores Thunder
Apple S7 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Apple S6 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Cores / Threads22 / 2
Announced
CodenameThunder
Clock1800 MHz
Technology4 nm
ArchitectureARM

Benchmarks

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 S9 +
46353 ms (54%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 S9 +
902 ms (10%)

Average Benchmarks Apple S9 SiP → 0% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 16. 05:55:45

#0 checking url part for id 12765 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16392 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 May 2024 05:39:24 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.119s ... 0.12s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.12s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12765 +0.003s ... 0.123s

#7 got single benchmarks 12765 +0.01s ... 0.133s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16392 +0.003s ... 0.135s

#9 got single benchmarks 16392 +0.008s ... 0.143s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.143s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.151s

#12 return log +0.038s ... 0.189s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)